In order to form a legally binding contract it is necessary that both parties provide valuable consideration.

Is the provision by a user on this (or other Stack Exchange sites) of a question, answer or comment "valuable consideration" sufficient to form a contract?

  • 1
    As I suggest here: Not only are users who provide content providing valuable consideration, but so are visitors who merely load a page! – feetwet Aug 17 '15 at 0:01
  • @feetwet The fact that a third-party pays on the basis of a users visit is not valuable consideration from the user - a contract cannot be formed on the because A provides a service for B for which C will pay for; A & C may have a contract and C may have provided a gift to A but A & B do not have a contract. – Dale M Aug 17 '15 at 0:09

Yes. There's no requirement that the consideration be objectively valuable, as there's no real standard for value; as long as there is some consideration, it can be offered for a contract.

The peppercorn rule states that nominal consideration is sufficient to constitute consideration for the purposes of establishing a contract. Even if later, we decide that the comments or posts are no longer desired, it does not cease to be good consideration.

| improve this answer | |
  • Specifically then, the consideration would be in the licence the user provided under the T&C? – Dale M Aug 17 '15 at 6:32
  • The content that is licensed to SE, yes. – jimsug Aug 17 '15 at 8:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.