3

Often when the media describe right to work fights, they say federal regulation mandates unions must negotiate for and give benefits to non-union employees. One example from the Huffington Post is as follows, but this can be found many places.

Under U.S. labor law, a union must represent all the employees in a workplace it has unionized, even those who may not want representation. Unions say it’s only fair that all the workers in the bargaining unit pay fees to the union to cover the costs of bargaining.

On the other hand, I read in an article by the National Right to Work Committee (a lobbying group for "right to work" laws) that unions don't actually have to represent an entire workforce and are free to represent dues paying members only.

In his November 2014 majority opinion upholding Indiana’s Right to Work law, Justice Brent Dickson bluntly noted:

The union’s federal obligation to represent all employees in a bargaining unit is optional; it occurs only when the union elects to be the exclusive bargaining agent, for which it is justly compensated by the right to bargain exclusively with the employer.

I'm skeptical of the Right to Work Committee article. It's one lobbying group article against probably hundreds in the mainstream media portrayal, but the article quotes case law and a judge.

Does federal regulation actually require unions to represent non-dues paying employees? Are unions allowed to forgo their privilege as the 'exclusive bargaining agent' and negotiate only on behalf of members?

migrated from politics.stackexchange.com Oct 2 '17 at 14:28

This question came from our site for people interested in governments, policies, and political processes.

  • This appears to be a question about interpretation of laws, not about the legislative processes which create laws. That means it's a question for Law Stackexchange, not Politics Stackexchange. I will migrate the question. – Philipp Oct 2 '17 at 14:28
2

The answer is yes, unions can be required to represent non-union employees, under certain circumstances.

First, the union must be the exclusive representative of the employees. Exclusive means just what you think, they are the only ones allowed to bargain for the employees. Union occasionally chose to be non-exclusive, but this is rare.

Second, it must be a 'Right to Work' state (there are 27). A 'Right to Work'state is a state that has passed a law stating that employees are not required to join the union to work for the employer. (In non-Right to Work states, an employee might pay for only non-political union expenses under Beck Rights).

Or, as the National Labor Relations Board states: " In these [Right to Work] states, it is up to each employee at a workplace to decide whether or not to join the union and pay dues, even though all workers are protected by the collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the union." NLRB Employer/Union Rights and Obligations

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.