4

Suppose that I unconditionally and unambiguously give a person a thing such as a necklace with a moderate value (say $1000): I hand it to them and say "Here, you can have this, I don't need it anymore". Then suppose I have giver's remorse and the next day I request that it be returned. Assuming that the recipient has not relied on the fact of me giving it to them (all they would lose is the necklace), can I revoke the act of giving (so that the courts would order the return of the gift)?

Then, suppose that I intended to give necklace A but mistakenly gave necklace B which I did not intend to give: can I legally reclaim B? In case it's not clear, I am not asking how I can guarantee a take-back right prior to giving the thing, so agreements are irrelevant. As always, relevant citations appreciated.

3

No.

By handing the necklace the way you described, you commit personal property transfer as all the three requirements are met for the gift to be legally effective: donative intent, delivery and acceptance.

Once property has been transferred (no matter gift or sale), it is not yours anymore.

  • 2
    A caveat is that if the donor didn't have the authority to make the unconditional gift, for example, because the gift rendered the donor insolvent, a third party creditor could have the gift set aside as a fraudulent transfer and force the donee to return it and pay it over to the creditor even if the donee was entirely blameless. But the donor couldn't invoke that right personally. – ohwilleke Nov 27 '17 at 3:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.