2

I know that classical music is public domain, so no-one can claim that they own classical music. But I add a classical music: I. Allegro in one of my Youtube videos (https://youtu.be/WJ13om_YkKg), and I see that NaxosofAmerica claims copyright for that. Am I missing something?

Here is the screenshot that NaxosofAmerica claims.

NaxosofAmerica claims copyright

  • I'd also like to know why it's a problem because there is no advertising on the video of my son performing & definitely no revenue coming in from it. People can't even view it yet the exact same piece of music is allowed by many others of them performing it. – Nicole Sarembock Nov 3 at 14:10
  • This does not seem to be an attempt to answer the question. If you have a new question it should be posted as a new question. Or it could be a comment. – George White Nov 3 at 19:27
6

I know that classical music is public domain, so no-one can claim that they own classical music.

That's not quite right, at least not under US law. First off, "classical music" is a style, and music in that style is not automatically in the public domain. The rule for if music is in the public domain depends on when it was written, not what style it's in. For instance, music written in the US after 1926 is likely to still be copyrighted.

Second, that's about copyright in the composition. A recorded performance has its own copyright, separate from the copyright the composer has in the composition. Even if Beethoven's Ninth Symphony is public domain, a performance of it by the New York Philharmonic involves creative interpretation and belongs to the orchestra (assuming it was recorded). So unless the recording you used was public domain, it still is subject to copyright. In the US, copyright for recordings after 1972 mirrors normal copyright law; copyright for recordings before 1972 is complicated.

Third, Youtube's system involves some amount of automation. It is possible that the Content ID claim involves an automated system incorrectly thinking your recording was a copyrighted one. That's why you can dispute a Content ID flag and ask the copyright holder to review it manually.

  • 2
    It’s almost certain the OP is using a recording that post dates 1972 and is therefore under copyright – Dale M Dec 14 '17 at 19:30
0

I know that classical music is public domain, so no-one can claim that they own classical music.

It isn't that simple.

Copyright laws vary by country, but in many places, a recording of a performance of a musical composition can be copyrighted separately from the composition itself. It may be that the original composition was created so long ago that it's no longer protected by copyright. But if you used a recording that was created more recently, then that recording probably is copyrighted by the performers, or the music label to whom they may have transferred their copyrighted.

We can't help you with determining whether this particular copyright claim is valid, or what you should do about it - that would be legal advice, which we don't give on this site.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.