0

Justice Jackson's dissent in Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949):

This Court has gone far toward accepting the doctrine that civil liberty means the removal of all restraints from these crowds and that all local attempts to maintain order are impairments of the liberty of the citizen. The choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either. There is danger that, if the Court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it will convert the constitutional Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.

A ELU user explained it:

The phrase "The Constitution is not a suicide pact" contends that the civil rights guaranteed under a constitution (the U.S. Constitution specifically, but I suppose it could apply to any constitution) should not be construed in such a way as to enable the destruction of the society it governs.

But I still don't understand the relevance or metaphor of 'suicide pact'. What/Who metaphorically has agreed to suicide? How've they agreed? What is the 'suicide'? 'Destruction of the society' isn't necessary suicide, e.g. if it's something not agreed that destroys (e.g. civil war, nuclear weapons accident).

closed as off-topic by BlueDogRanch, user6726, Pat W., Dale M, Nij Dec 21 '17 at 7:14

  • This question does not appear to be about law, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

Generally, it would likely refer to the states or the citizens, or both. The suicide would be the breakdown of governance (e.g., the onset of anarchy). It is an analogy, of course, so you shouldn't be taking these comments so literally. The gist is that, functionally, an agreement is not set up to destroy said agreement. The Constitution therefore does not provide for liberties that would unravel the very thing ("society" / the country) it was written to preside over or govern. Therefore, any interpretation of it which would serve to do so is incorrect.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.