1

Microsoft was forced to publish its protocols in 2007 as a result of the competition case brought by the European Commission. These are available at Microsoft's Open Specifications page including, for example, "Kerberos Protocol Extensions" and "Excel Binary File Format".

In 2011 Microsoft bought Skype, which they used to replace Messenger and Lync.

Why did they not have to publish the Skype protocol?

|improve this question

migrated from retrocomputing.stackexchange.com Mar 4 '18 at 16:38

This question came from our site for vintage-computer hobbyists interested in restoring, preserving, and using the classic computer and gaming systems of yesteryear.

  • Actually Lync is still used... "Skype" for business. – Rui F Ribeiro Mar 4 '18 at 17:33
  • 2
    Because MS bought Skype after the 2007 settlement? – BlueDogRanch Mar 5 '18 at 0:36
  • Because Skype doesn't have a dominant market share that excludes competition from other companies, and therefore isn't within reach of anti-competitive practice legislation. – Jules Mar 5 '18 at 9:10
6

Because the agreement covers the IP relating to a specific list of file-sharing, printer-sharing, and user-management protocols (the Workgroup Server Protocol Program) — basically, things relating to Samba — and not everything that Microsoft ever did or ever will do.

|improve this answer
  • That Microsoft link mentions the EC's decision says Microsoft "shall ... make the Interoperability Information available ... " and "kept updated on an ongoing basis". Interoperability Information is defined as interaction between Windows Workgroup Server and Client OSes "to deliver file and print services and group and user administration services, including the Windows Domain Controller services, Active Directory services and Group Policy services, to Windows Workgroup Networks". (Pages 298 - 300.) – Ben C Mar 7 '18 at 20:53
  • (That may differ if the EC and MS agreed something subtly different later, but that's harder to establish. I don't see a time limit to MS having to update this information.) – Ben C Mar 7 '18 at 20:54
  • If Skype is served by MS on a central server, or peer-to-peer, rather than on a Windows Workgroup server, then that may explain why it isn't covered by the above. – Ben C Mar 7 '18 at 20:55
  • @BenC Just because it runs on a Windows Workgroup server doesn't mean it is one. Stack EXchange runs on Windows servers, that doesn't mean that if Microsoft had written Stack Exchange they'd need to publish any details about it. They're talking about the protocols integrated into the OS itself. – user253751 Apr 3 '18 at 5:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.