There are many videos on Youtube and it doesn't seem they are being removed, so one might conclude that they do not infringe copyright of the game publisher. But it could also be that for copyright purposes these constitute derivative works, but game publishers are happy to have the publicity and so they don't request Youtube remove the videos.

I have noticed that gameplay videos sometimes miss the game's original sound. One video's description explained that the sound had to be removed since it (naturally) contained music from the game.

Is it possible that video of gameplay constitutes but audio, at least in some situations, does not?

Are these questions subject to license terms of the video game software?

  • Interesting question. I just tightened it to make it more clearly about the applicable laws.
    – feetwet
    Commented Apr 1, 2018 at 14:33
  • 1
    I wouldn't put much stock (in fact, effectively none) in the information about copyright provided by a YouTube video. More likely they misread an actual explanation of copyright principles (especially fair use) and needed to remove the audio anyway for separate production reason.
    – user4657
    Commented Apr 2, 2018 at 5:29

1 Answer 1


In general, a gameplay video would be either a partial copy or a derivative work, and in either case an infringement if created without permission. Such a video might be covered under fair use in US copyright law, particularly if made for the purpose of commentary on a game or instruction in how to play or design a game.

In general, a fair use defense is more likely to succeed if only the minimum amount of the work required for the purpose is used, and sound tracks might not be required for such a purpose. Thus a maker of such a video might choose to omit the sound to improve the fair-use case.

Moreover, when the sound track contains licensed popular music it would be subject to a separate copyright, and many music publishers are notoriously litigious, so prudence would advise omitting the sound.

All that said, fair-use is a case-by-case determination, and if the makers of such videos have not been sued, they (and we) can only guess how a case would turn out. As to why game makers refrain from having such videos taken down (if they in fact do refrain) one can only speculate. Game publishers may consider the videos good advertising.

Questions based on the absence of legal proceedings are inherently speculative, unless a copyright holder has announced a policy of not taking action and the reasons for it.

  • Game publishers may consider the videos good advertising - Of course. I would be surprised if this was not the explanation to why they don't take any action - in fact game developers often actively try and make their games play well along with screen capture software for the purposes of either recording or streaming. P.S. I imagine it would fare extremely bad if a game company were to sue someone over uploading a gameplay video to Youtube (or another platform).
    – Marc.2377
    Commented Sep 28, 2019 at 21:16
  • @Marc.2377 you say that, but recently Microsoft changed their stance on Minecraft videos much to the chagrin that promoted their product into the #1 game of all time spot. They changed it to "well, if we don't like you we'll get rid of you" kind of thing. I tried to get more clarification here, but the question got closed, which is such a typical SE response. Commented Jan 24 at 0:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .