1

There is a transcription of a song that I put in a video. YouTube obviously told me that it is copyrighted and that they might put ads in my video. Can transcriptions actually have a copyright as they are not original compositions? If not, would I still need to get permission from the original author?

1

1 Answer 1

3

A transcription can be a creative work, so it can be protected by copyright (no commitment about that particular instance). A transcription is copying and transforming an original work in a particular (symbolic). The original work that the transcription is based on is also protected by copyright, so to make the copy that embodies the transcription, you need permission from the original rights holder. Splicing the transcription onto an illegal copy of an original performance is also copyright infringement, but resynthesis based on the transcription is not. A transcription also might not be entitled to copyright protection, if it is the product of a computer program, since feeding a sound file into a program is not a creative activity. (The program that generated the transcription is, of course, protected by copyright).

3
  • 1
    The term of art in copyright law, both in the US and in the Berne convention, is "derivative work." With the plain meaning of "derivative" in mind it is clear that it includes transcriptions.
    – phoog
    Apr 16, 2018 at 20:11
  • You should address transcripts made from live speach - these are original works protected by copyright.
    – Dale M
    Apr 16, 2018 at 21:15
  • 1
    A transcript of live speech isn't a special case. If a stenographer transcribes live spontaneous speech, that transcription is the only creative work; otherwise, the original copyright is in the reader's script or the recording first made.
    – user6726
    Apr 16, 2018 at 21:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .