I've been searching this for some time now, and so far it appears that there are no laws in Canada that prohibit shooting a arrow from a bow (with the exception of prohibited cross-bows) under the criminal code.

From what I can tell, unless there is a municipal bylaw in effect that prohibits the shooting of a bow inside municipal limits, the only piece of legislation that regulates where you can shoot a bow is Section 52 of the Wildlife Act, which prohibits shooting within 200 yards of an occupied building (unless it's your own).

If no bylaw is in effect within the boundaries of a municipality, is it legal to shoot a bow in a municipality?

  • As the answer below explains, it matters why you shoot the arrow. Most plausible reasons for doing so are regulated, even though there isn't an outright prohibition.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Oct 5, 2018 at 1:22

1 Answer 1


Applicable Laws

For most purposes, the federal criminal code applies

In Canada, the criminal code is national rather than adopted province by province, although provinces and municipalities have some authority to sanction conduct in some way or another outside the criminal code, such as the Wildlife Act and regulations under it.

Zoning laws

Also, municipal bylaws might not address shooting a bow and arrow on its face, but might instead regulate land use in general and state that only certain activities are authorized on a particular parcel of land and those activities may not include, for example, target shooting of bows and arrows or "recreational activities".

The Reasons You Are Using The Bow and Arrow Matter

You really need to consider the purpose for which the bow is shot, because while there isn't a general prohibition, there are prohibitions applicable to most reasons for using them.

If you are dueling

If it was part of a duel, that would be a crime in Canada. R.S., c. C-34, s. 72.

If you are subject to a prohibition order

If the user is subject to a prohibition order (the U.S. equivalent term would be a protection order), a bow and arrow could be prohibited under that order. R.S., c. C-34, s. 109-111.

If you are hunting, or if you are shooting it within 200 yards of an occupied building

Even if target shooting is not regulated or prohibited in a municipality, you would ordinarily need a license to hunt anything under the applicable hunting regulations of Alberta. In particular:

Hunters must possess a valid Wildlife Certificate and the applicable hunting licence to hunt big game or game birds.

This includes bow hunting. And, as you note, Section 52 of the Wildlife Act, which prohibits shooting within 200 yards of an occupied building (unless it's your own). Realistically, there aren't many places in an urban municipality that are not within 200 yards of an occupied building.

If your conduct endangers the public or obstructs others rights

In many circumstances, shooting arrows with a bow could constitute a common nuisance. R.S., c. C-34, s. 180.

180 (1) Every one who commits a common nuisance and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or

(b) causes physical injury to any person,

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

Marginal note:Definition

(2) For the purposes of this section, every one commits a common nuisance who does an unlawful act or fails to discharge a legal duty and thereby

(a) endangers the lives, safety, health, property or comfort of the public; or

(b) obstructs the public in the exercise or enjoyment of any right that is common to all the subjects of Her Majesty in Canada.

If you threaten to hurt a person or animal without justification

Likewise, if you aim your bow at someone with an arrow nocked without this justification, this probably constitutes a criminal offense called "unlawful threat", R.S., c. C-34, s. 264.1, which is an unlawful threat and a crime when one:

in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat

(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;

(b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or

(c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.

If you hit a person or animal without justification

Even if you don't intend to hit a person or animal, if you do, it would probably at least constitute the tort of negligence, and probably criminal negligence, R.S., c. C-34, s. 219-221, or assault with a weapon causing bodily harm, R.S., c. C-34, s. 267, or aggravated assault, R.S., c. C-34, s. 268, or homicide, R.S., c. C-34, s. 222 an 229, or injuring or endangering animals, R.S., c. C-34, s. 445, depending upon the circumstances. The definition of weapon in one related statute would probably apply and would cover a real (as opposed to a toy) bow and arrow, even though it is technically restricted to a particular statutory section R.S., c. C-34, s. 270.1(2).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .