Landlords are not allowed to discrimate against a sex when renting to tenants as this is one of the protected classes.

How do universities get away with discriminating against a sex when filling dorms though? Public universities declare a specific dorm 'all male' or 'all female'.

  • 1
    If you can cite an example of a public university with all-male or all-female dorms, that would help us answer the question. Basically, they can't and don't, so counterexamples need scrutiny.
    – user6726
    Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 17:12
  • I was also wondering where this was happening, but I'm not sure it matters. The public/private distinction doesn't seem to make a difference, and I think universities are still requiring that roommates be of the same sex, which I'd imagine is also an FHA violation.
    – bdb484
    Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 17:48
  • After a couple minutes of Googling: Hannon Hall at the University of Montana is "a cozy all-female hall..." Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 17:50
  • One can find lots of others where specific floors are designated single-gender, such as the 6th floor of Orr Hall at the University of Wyoming (PDF). Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 17:57
  • Does the existence of single sex dorms come down to the fact that schools simply offer them? Either as an option among other options, like both sex dorms; or exclusively, as single sex dorms only being available? And single sex dorms exist because no one has legally challenged their existence? (As well as single sex floors in co-ed dorms and requirements for same-sex roommates?) Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 19:25

3 Answers 3


From what I can determine, there has not been a legal challenge to the practice that reached a high enough level to get on my radar, so it's not clearly prohibited or allowed. Turning to the relevant federal regulations, the implementation of the Fair Housing Act, the law hinges in part on an

Aggrieved person includes any person who—

(a) Claims to have been injured by a discriminatory housing practice; or

(b) Believes that such person will be injured by a discriminatory housing practice that is about to occur.

In order to sue a university because they offer sex-separated halls, floors or rooms, a plaintiff would have to show that they have been harmed by being given such a choice. Reading the prohibitions in §100.50, there is no obvious "Discriminat[ion] in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities", and it does not "otherwise makes unavailable or denies dwellings". Cases like McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (a case putting an end to the "separate but equal" doctrine) include reference to the fact that appellant was harmed ("The restrictions imposed upon appellant impair and inhibit his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession"). Analogously, the relatively rare black-only residences of UC Davis and Cal State LA might be targeted in a discrimination suit, if plaintiffs can make the required legal argument that there is harm.


In Australia there is a specific exemption in the Sex Discrimination Act - s34(2):

Nothing in Division 1 or 2 applies to or in relation to the provision of accommodation, where the accommodation is provided solely for persons of one sex who are students at an educational institution.

Such exemptions are pretty universal in anti-discrimination laws.

  • I was figuring that I would immediately find that this was the case here, but I see cases holding that our Fair Housing Act does apply to schools.
    – bdb484
    Commented Nov 7, 2018 at 21:01

Part of this is that students are not a protected class under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). So an educational organization that offers housing, can say that the housing is for students only, and not offer housing to the general public. That doesn't mean the FHA doesn't apply, but what it does mean is that students can be discriminated against.

So, first a college can say that they only admit male or female students (an all-one-sex college, not many exist but they are out there). They can also state that the housing that they offer is for students only, which would limit a dormitory to all male/female occupants.

Second, a college that is mixed-gender can provide both types of housing and say that one type of housing is for males and the other females. They can limit this by only admitting X number of male students and Y number of female students (my college did this and had limited female housing, with about a 10:1 male-female admittance).

This isn't discrimination as it applies under the FHA. They aren't offering rooms to the general public (you need to be a student to get into the dorms). That means that these rooms are being assigned based on sex, but you are not denied a room based on gender (you may be denied admission, but that is another topic). For example you usually don't walk through the dorms and pick out your favorite room like you would an apartment, they are assigned.

FHA applies to students, a female student can be assigned a female dorm, and a male in a male dorm, but it is not discrimination to say that "Dorm X is all female, Dorm Y is all male". So long as the policy applies to all students equally, it is not discrimination.

So, for example an all-female school can only admit females. It can say that "only students allowed in the dorms", and because only females are students, that means that only females can live there.

Off campus housing is an entirely different matter if it is not owned or operated by the school.

  • 1
    So, what about the University of Montana (linked above)? It has male and female students in roughly equal numbers, and according to umt.edu/housing/rh/faqs/default.php, dorm assignments are generally first-come-first-served. So if you are one of the earlier applicants, it's quite possible that you would otherwise be able to live in a particular dorm, but will be denied solely because of your gender. I don't see how your arguments cover this case. Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 3:18
  • Again, they aren't holding this out to the general public, so they provide a limited number of male dorms, and a limited number of female dorms. It isn't a matter of being denied "because you are X/Y gender", it is that they don't have any more available space. I just don't think that would fall under the guise of gender discrimination. My school (Milwaukee School of Engineering) was similar, it had two 12-floor dorms of which 2 floors of each were dedicated to female and the rest male.
    – Ron Beyer
    Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 3:44
  • 1
    I'm afraid I'm still not following your logic. At Montana, it appears that students state which dorm(s) they prefer to live in, and are assigned rooms accordingly while space is available. If I am first to apply to Montana, and I say I want to live in Hannon Hall, and am female, I presumably will be assigned a room in that dorm. But if I am male and make the same request, I will be refused, even if there are plenty of rooms available in that dorm. So I don't see how the "space" argument plays a role. Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 4:09
  • I too have trouble understanding how the fact that discrimination against non students is legal makes it legal to discriminate for sex. A business can discriminate against non-employees by not giving them a bonus, but certainly a company policy stating that only male employees may qualify for a bonus would be illegal.
    – SJuan76
    Commented Nov 8, 2018 at 9:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .