4

Reviewing some software licenses I found statements like this:

The software code shall be treated as trade secrets and confidential information.

But the source code can be freely downloaded from the very same author's webpage, which hardly makes it a secret. Does it mean I am supposed to treat it as if no one could have access to the code, even though everybody can see it?

Edit: I will add that this is scientific software. They come accompanied by a public paper that describes the inner workings of the program; so one could in theory read the paper and reimplement the software without ever looking at the original source.

4

The essential parts of a trade secret are that (a) it is something that you keep secret, and (b) something that gives you an advantage in trade because you know it and others don't.

A trade secret remains a trade secret if you give it to someone else under a non-disclosure agreement. If it is available where anyone can download it, either intentionally or by carelessness, then it isn't a trade secret anymore (as soon as it actually gets downloaded).

If it gets made public through some illegal activity, well, that's too complicated for me.

Anyway, YOU don't have to pretend anything. A claim that something is a trade secret doesn't make it one. And if something is a trade secret, no claim about it is necessary. If you download the software without doing anything illegal then it isn't a trade secret.

To reply to the comment: If the sequence of events is this: I download the source code. I read the license. The license says "by using the software ..." then clearly I have the source code before using the software. At that point the trade secret status is lost. We don't need to discuss whether the license would have been enforcible, because the software is already downloaded before the license starts applying. I can tell anyone in the world about it. (I can't give the software to anyone, because that is copyright infringement, a totally different matter).

|improve this answer|||||
  • Could a EULA stipulate that by using the software, you agree to be bound by an NDA that requires you maintain the trade secret? Would such a clause be enforceable or laughable? – Patrick87 Sep 22 '15 at 13:39
  • @Patrick87 You have to take reasonable efforts to keep it a secret. NDAs don't automatically mean it stays a trade secret, if you try to use them to avoid keeping it actually a secret. – cpast Mar 22 '16 at 4:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.