I've been wondering why, when a restaurant says something is "homemade" but it's clearly not made in somebody's home, that's not considered false advertising. If homemade doesn't imply made at home then what's the difference between something that's homemade and something that isn't?

(As another example, I imagine the case I'd similar with things like "sun-dried tomatoes" although I can't really prove it one way or another.)

2 Answers 2


Why does a word like “homemade” not constitute false advertising?

It is not amount to false advertising when its mention in the advertisement matches the common, ordinary usage of the term. In that case, the advertisement does not deceive or mislead the customers. The law only sanctions practices that are deceptive, not those which are substantially truthful.

From another standpoint, see Black's Law Dictionary entry for Home Office:

As applied to a corporation, its principal office within the state or country where it was incorporated or formed.

This legal definition reflects that the word home does not necessarily require or imply personal residence.

If homemade doesn't imply made at home then what's the difference between something that's homemade and something that isn't?

An item which is supplied (whether substantially or in its entirety) by an external entity would not be considered homemade.

In the context of restaurants, it is obvious that the ingredients are supplied from outside and therefore are not homemade (or homegrown). But if most or all of the preparation of a dish takes place at the facility, it would reasonably meet the criterion of being homemade. This is in contrast with a scenario where the labor of preparation is minimal because the product is delivered to the facility practically in its final, consumption-ready state.

  • Interesting, thanks. So by this definition pretty much any restaurant food that's cooked there qualifies as homemade?
    – user541686
    Commented Mar 19, 2019 at 19:58
  • @Mehrdad I would say yes (note that by cooked I mean something more than heated). That being said, my conjecture is that restaurants reserve the prefix homemade only for dishes they intend to market as their specialty. Commented Mar 19, 2019 at 20:05

As mentioned in this article on food advertising, a charge of flaew advertising under US Federal law (the Lanham Act) requires that there be:

  • A false or misleading statement, one that is either directly false or deceptive in effect

  • Reasonable reliance on the statement. An obviously incredible claim, or a wildly implausible interpretation of a statement will not lead to a successful suit for false advertising

  • A material representation, that is a statement or claim likely to affect the decision to purchase the item.

It is not reasonable to take a statement such as "homemade" on a restaurant menu or the label of food commercially mass-marketed, and think that this means that it was cooked in someone private house. Therefore, such a statement is not false advertising.

There is a limited but growing market for so-called "cottage food", food actually made in a private home, as described in this article. In those cases calling something "homemade" when it isn't might be false advertising.

  • 2
    I guess I might as well scrap my lawsuit about how much I can believe it's not butter .
    – Roger
    Commented Jan 28, 2020 at 22:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .