I am looking for a classification of laws from a perspective of consequences of action.

For example:

"If you do this, something good will happen to you." "If you do this, something bad will happen to you." "If you do this, nothing bad will happen to you."

"If you don't do this, something good will happen to you." "If you don't do this, something bad will happen to you." "If you don't do this, nothing bad will happen to you."

Is there a term for this?

Or is there a term for each one of these?

Thank you.

  • Welcome to Law.SE! The terms used in psychology are positive and negative reinforcement.
    – A. K.
    Apr 9 '19 at 16:58
  • The last example you gave isn't even a valid sentence, it's self-contradictory...
    – Ron Beyer
    Apr 10 '19 at 0:11
  • Yes, in psychology, they would be reward, punishment, positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement. In religious laws, there are many examples of rewards and punishment in this life or the after life. But I am looking for a legal concept or legal theory which is used to construct "statutory law" enacted by a legislature or "regulatory law" (in the U.S.) created by executive branch agencies pursuant to delegation of rule-making authority from the legislature. I am looking for some answer like "affirming a positive" and "affirming a negative".
    Apr 10 '19 at 1:28
  • For example: You should pay your taxes by April 15th. If you don't, then this is an act of nonfeasance, and there will be consequences. You should not submit a false claim for a tax refund. If you do, then this is an act of malfeasance, and there will be consequences. Is there any legal term for "affirming or mandating a positive" and "affirming or mandating a negative"? Logically, nonfeasance and malfeasance would follow.
    Apr 10 '19 at 1:28

Your question is incredibly unclear and it is hard to say what you are really getting at.

The big divisions in the U.S. in terms of types law are based largely upon the remedies available in each type of litigation (and it is more useful to think of litigation as a means of legal rights enforcement or requests for justice to be done, rather than in the popular vernacular in the profession as "dispute resolution" forums).

These are:

Criminal law, where the consequences include incarceration and non-compensatory fines, but compensation for victims is limited to restitution which is often quite grudging. The cases are brought by the People (basically, the government) against someone who has violated a particular criminal statute.

Civil litigation at law, where the consequences typically involve an award of compensatory money damages, punitive damages proportional to the compensatory damages, or possession or ownership of particular items of property, and there is a right to a jury trial. These are lawsuits brought by one person against another. Debt collection cases, personal injury cases, evictions, repossessions, and sometimes foreclosures of legal mortgages are included in this category.

Civil litigation in equity, where judges can issue orders telling someone to do something or not do something, which are called injunctions, can dissolve or form legal relationships like divorces and guardianships, in which there is no right to a jury trial. These are lawsuits brought by one person against another, and also situations that require court intervention even in the absence of wrongdoing or disputes (like the appointment of a guardian for a minor child) in situations that mainly involve private parties.

Administrative law, where a government agency's treatment of someone or grant of a privilege or regulation is at issue, such as driver's license revocation hearings, deportation proceedings, real property zoning change requests, environmental regulation notice and comment in advance of regulations issuing, etc. A key subset of this is tax law. These pit the government against a private party, or two people disputing what the government should do disputing each other with the government either taking sides or taking its own way or not offering an opinion. They typically start outside the court system but are subject to judicial review by the courts.

The reality is messier than that, so law and equity issues, for example, may be tried in the same case, but those are the main divisions of U.S. law and are mostly based upon the types of remedies available. Sometimes all of these kinds of law will be handled in a single court, but the procedures that apply to each kind of case vary.

  • It seems to me that the two categories of civil litigation should include cases where a government (or part of one) is seeking a civil penalty or an injunction, and ones where a person or firm sues the government for damages or an injunction or both. Perhaps saying "one entity sues another" rather than "one person" would cover this. Apr 11 '19 at 2:19
  • Fair enough. I'm not inclined to rewrite it but those kinds of litigation exist too. The latter I think of as administrative law to some extent, but government is certainly often a plaintiff in equity litigation.
    – ohwilleke
    Apr 11 '19 at 2:27

Something good: reward.

Something bad: punishment.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.