-4

Today US Senator Elizabeth Warren released her family's tax returns, as reported here by LA Times. Article says that:

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has released her tax return for 2018, reporting that she and her husband paid more than $200,000 in taxes on a joint income of about $900,000 last year.

That comes down to about 22% tax rate. When I take into account marginal tax rate total tax comes up to about $275k = $164k+0.37*$300k which is effectively 30%, following this table:

enter image description here

Is that calculation correct? Does it mean Senator's family got deductions worth $75k in taxes?

closed as off-topic by BlueDogRanch, user6726, Nij, Pat W., StephanS Apr 11 at 15:31

  • This question does not appear to be about law, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs on money.stackexchange.com – BlueDogRanch Apr 10 at 16:13
  • 2
    In does not mean that: they had $60,128 in deductions. This information is on Schedule A. – user6726 Apr 10 at 16:37
  • 2
    Deductions reduce income, rather than reducing tax directly. Credits reduce taxes directly. It is likely that the Warrens claimed some combination of deductions and credits. – David Siegel Apr 10 at 16:50
  • 1
    @BlueDogRanch While this doesn't seem to be explicitly off topic for Personal Finance & Money, it seems that the question may be motivated by an intent that would be better suited to Politics. – phoog Apr 10 at 18:11
  • 1
    i thought about proper SE and for me money="how can i pay less taxes", politics="why candidates [dont] publish their tax returns", and law="do i understand law right here" – aaaaaa Apr 10 at 18:22
7

Not all income is taxed at the rates you cite. Special rates apply to long term capital gain and qualified dividends (maximum rate 20%). There are $1,349 of qualified dividends in this case and $3000 of capital losses that can be taken in the current year (this is the cap for capital losses against ordinary income).

The benefit the Warren receives from these special tax rates is negligible.

There are also above the line deductions ($59,348) and itemized deductions (they claimed $60,128 of them that reduce their taxable income), credits (which reduce taxes dollar for dollar of which they claimed $13,936) and the carry forward of losses that couldn't be claimed in full in a prior year for some reason (which is functionally similar to a deduction) of which the Warrens have $102,276 but could only use $3,000 in the current year.

While they doesn't appear to be included in the $905,742 of gross income figure cited, certain kinds of income are also exempt from inclusion on a tax return such as qualified municipal bond interest, certain income in the form of wages and salaries earned abroad, certain disability payments, personal injury settlements (exclusive of interest components) and alimony received under a post-2017 divorce decree, to name a few. None of these items are relevant for Warren.

According to @JackFleeting in his answer:

they had gross income of $905,742, AGI of $846,394, taxable income of $786,266 and tax liability of $230,965

Per the chart, the tax due on ordinary income of $786,266 is $229,058 by my calculation. This is reduced by a $13,936 residential energy credit (because she installed solar panels on her home), and $8,696 of additional federal tax as self-employment taxation, and $6,137 of self-employment and Obamacare taxes netted against overwitholding of Medicare taxes.

The itemized deductions were $60,128 which consists of state and local income tax payments (limited to $10,000 of $78,086 incurred in 2018) and charitable deductions of $50,128 (about 5.5% of her income).

Warren herself, like most middle and upper middle class people in the Northeast, fares very badly with respect to deductions in 2018 compared to all prior years when they were not subject to a $10,000 cap.

For reference purposes, the disallowed itemized deductions increased her tax bill by $25,192 (itemized deductions don't impact the amount of FICA, self-employment tax and Obamacare tax due). On the other hand, she benefits from the lower tax brackets in 2018 compared to those in 2017. Overall the 2017 tax law reduced Warren's taxes by about $2,713 (a little more than 1.1% of her total tax bill and about 0.3% of her family's gross income).

There are "above the line" adjustments to income in the amount of $59,348, there is a self-employment adjustment to correct for the self-employed paying both employee and employer FICA ($4,348) and adjustment for a retirement plan contribution in the maximum allowed amount of $55,000. Notably, she took no business expenses as deductions against her writing income. Her husband had a whopping $18 of self-employment income and took $803 of professional organization dues as a business expense.

Her self-employment income does not qualify for the pass though entity tax break created by the 2017 tax law.

Above the line deductions simply convert your self-employment income to the numbers they were be if you were an employee of someone else with the same benefits.

The marginal tax rate that Warren pays on each additional dollar of self-employment income (e.g. writing) is about 40.94% from all applicable taxes combined.

5

Looking at the actual tax return here, they had gross income of $905,742, AGI of $846,394, taxable income of $786,266 and tax liability of $230,965. So their effective tax rate (which is usually calculated on taxable income, not gross income or AGI) was 29.37%.

  • 2
    Another way of describing it, is that she paid the equivalent of a flat tax at a rate of 29.37% on her taxable income. – ohwilleke Apr 10 at 18:40
  • 1
    The formula Turbotax uses for millions of taxpayers is: Effective rate(%) = Tax Liability times 100 then divided by divided by Adjusted Gross Income. – BobE Apr 11 at 2:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.