0

Normally, if someone writes libelous material about somebody online, they are traced by name and/or IP address. But, let’s say there are neither. So, someone wants to accuse someone of using meth on Reddit. This user has been active for quite some time and never revealed his or her IP. Then, this user says that the actor, politician, or whoever it may be is using meth. Reddit removes the content but it keeps spreading. Could the original uploader be sued if the VPN refuses to listen?

  • 1
    The hypothetical that "the VPN refuses to listen" sounds confusing, but suing the author precedes --and differs from-- subpoenaing a non-party and enforcing compliance therewith (which can only happen during court proceedings). You should specify the jurisdiction (country or state). That is because in some of them (example: the U.S.), plaintiffs who are public figures have to prove that a defamatory statement was made with actual malice, meaning that the defamer published it with reckless disregard of the truth or despite knowing it was false. Also, procedural law varies by jurisdiction. – Iñaki Viggers Sep 16 at 19:14
1

Yes

State action

Finding the person to prosecute is difficult but that is one of the major functions of law enforcement agencies. ISPs and VPN providers are, in some jurisdictions, required to keep metadata which is available to law enforcement either with or without a warrant depending on local law. Law enforcement agencies have varying levels of cooperation across jurisdictions - so the US FBI can request information from the UK Metropolitan Police who can request a warrant from a UK court to access a UK VPN company’s metadata and provide that to the FBI.

If they can find you, arrest you and extradite you, they can prosecute you.

Private action

In theory, private actors can find and sue people as well although the generally lack the resources and power to compel action that state actors do.

It is possible to commence a lawsuit against a known but unidentified defendant, for example, the unidentified person who posted this on Reddit. Having commenced such a case they can then seek to subpoena whatever information Reddit, say, has about the person. Failure to comply with a subpoena is contempt of court.

This whole process is harder and less certain and generally not worth it - particularly when, if you ultimately find the person they are in a country which won’t honour the judgements of your country’s courts or they have no money to pay damages.

  • @john not really, there are 196 countries in the world, many with sub-national jurisdictions- which 2 are you interested in. – Dale M Sep 16 at 22:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.