We are making a college board game, and would like to know if we can use a few monsters from dnd to make our game. We don't use the same name as you do, just the images from online and the books.

  • 2
    You should search the site before posting: law.stackexchange.com/search?q=game+copyright Sep 30, 2019 at 14:54
  • 36
    You say "just" the images but the images are much more strongly protected than the names. Consider the amount of effort that goes into thinking up a name versus drawing a picture of the thing. Sep 30, 2019 at 22:47
  • 2
    You may be interested in reading about OrcPub (and OrcPub2) which was / is an online DnD character building tool and the various legal issues they have faced. Also, although I think you've posted your question in the right Stack Exchange site since it is legal based, be sure to check out rpg.stackexchange.com and boardgames.stackexchange.com if you haven't already. Oct 1, 2019 at 9:13
  • 17
    Please clarify: What do you mean with "a college board game"? Is it a project made for a class which is only meant to get you a good/passing grade? Or do you intent on making it a product?
    – Mefitico
    Oct 1, 2019 at 13:52

4 Answers 4


No. The images are copyrighted, and you are using them in a way that would leave you with virtually no argument for fair use. The factors for fair use are set out in 17 USC 107, and they indicate that the courts would reject your use:

  1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether it is of a commercial nature or for nonprofit educational purposes: There's no indication that your use would be for nonprofit or educational purposes.

  2. The nature of the copyrighted work: Works of fiction and art are highly creative works at the heart of the policy for copyright protection.

  3. The amount of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: You are apparently copying entire images, though I suppose you could argue that each image is just one small portion of a larger book or website.

  4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: You are trying to create a board game, putting yourselves basically in direct competition with the makers of D&D.

I generally prefer a pretty liberal interpretation of what constitutes fair use, but this just has virtually nothing that would make me comfortable arguing in your favor.

  • 7
    This only applies if they distribute it. Making a board game with copyrighted images for personal use is (As far as I know) perfectly okay. Oct 1, 2019 at 0:42
  • 14
    You are mistaken. It is the act of copying that violates the copyright.
    – bdb484
    Oct 1, 2019 at 2:11
  • 15
    On the flip side: it would essentially be impossible to show damages for that home-made board game, and there would insufficient public interest to justify criminal prosecution.
    – MSalters
    Oct 1, 2019 at 7:40
  • 8
    @bdb484 : who would suffer those damages? If the game was distributed, then yes, every game someone gets from the OP is potentially one less game being sold by the copyright owner. But if someone is creating and playing it privately, what damages does the copyright owner suffer? Singing a copyrighted song in a forest where no one can hear it is still technically illegal, but who is damaged if no one can hear it?
    – vsz
    Oct 1, 2019 at 11:52
  • 4
    @bdb484 It would be easy to show use, yes, but not to demonstrate that the copyright owner suffered more than trivial damages (i.e. the value of buying the game/image) as a result of that use, because it was private personal use.
    – ArtOfCode
    Oct 1, 2019 at 11:53

Many D&D monsters and creatures are based on creatures occurring in folklore and myth, such a vampires and trolls. Those are in the public domain, and anyone may use them freely. But images published as part of D&D, or by independent artists, are subject to copyright, and may not be used without permission. As the answer by bdb484 says, there seems no plausible case for a fair use exception to copyright here.

Note also that the specific descriptive text used in the D&D Monster Manual and other publications is protected by copyright, and may not be copied or closely paraphrased. This is true even when the creature being described is one from traditional folklore.

New creatures or monsters invented as part of D&D would be fully protected by copyright. While the general idea cannot be protected, anything based at al closely on a published description is likely to constitute copyright infringement.

If you were to copy content from published D&D books, a copyright suit might force you to stop distributing your game, and leave you with sizable damages to pay, depending on the exact facts.

You would be wise to invent your own monsters, or create your own versions of traditional monsters from legend and folklore.

  • 2
    Most D&D monsters have alternate-source images on the internet so you could probably build your game using monster names from the MM and open source images from the net. As David said--stick to common monsters, I believe Mind Flayer was created by D&D, but not "Greater Devil", "Blue Dragon" or "Elf". Stay away from the MM text too--don't base your attacks, stats or description on the text from the MM. Note that the original MM stole 2 chapters from other sources, was sued and had to remove them. It works both ways!
    – Bill K
    Oct 2, 2019 at 21:33
  • 2
    @BillK Be sure that any such images are in fact under a license that allows the intended use, and that they were posted with the authority of the copyright owner. It is unfortunately common for people to take images and repost them, claiming to relase them under a permissive license, when they have no right to do so. In such a case, any reuser relying on such a license commits infringement. Oct 2, 2019 at 21:37

As noted in other answers, no, you are not allowed to use these creatures under Fair Use. You could go back to their original mythological underpinnings (for those that have them), but you would have to take great care to make sure everything about them you describe comes from myth and not from D&D.

There is another option, however. Many Dungeons & Dragons monsters are available for use under the Open Game License. This does not cover images (at least not Wizards of the Coast’s images; some artists have released images of D&D monsters under the OGL), but it does cover their names, their stats, the names of their abilities, and their general “character.” It also does not cover certain particular iconic monsters, which Wizards of the Coast reserved as “product identity.” This would be beholder, carrion crawler, displacer beast, gauth, githyanki, githzerai, kuo-toa, mind flayer (illithid), slaad, umber hulk, and yuan-ti. It also doesn’t cover myriad other monsters that simply were never released in a book that got open-game treatment. But all of these monsters, for example, may be used.

Correctly following and using the Open-Game License requires some care. Read it carefully, and in particular pay close attention to the requirements in Section 15.

  • Just out of curiosity, why only OGL, no SRD mention?
    – nitsua60
    Oct 2, 2019 at 3:48
  • 2
    @nitsua60 Because the SRD isn’t really legally relevant. The SRD is just the original document that Wizards released under the OGL, but ultimately what you need to use any open-game content is the OGL, whether that’s the SRD or other open-game content (e.g. Pathfinder, maybe some 5e stuff?).
    – KRyan
    Oct 2, 2019 at 3:57
  • Ahh... okay. I'm probably not understanding the nuances of what exactly SRD(s) contain vs. OGL(s). Thanks!
    – nitsua60
    Oct 2, 2019 at 13:12
  • @nitsua60 Basically, OGL is the licence that can be used to allow you to re-use and redistribute certain D&D content. The SRD is one particular document released under that license.
    – KRyan
    Oct 2, 2019 at 13:13
  • You can find D&D-related images published under OGL by third-party publishers (in fact I have some on my machine, including the OGL that was distributed with them), but not the images from official rulebooks AFAIK. Oct 2, 2019 at 15:36

If this is a class assignment to create a game that you have no intention of distributing or selling, then I think you qualify for fair use. Within the context of a college class, it should qualify as educational.

If you are creating a game aimed at the college marketplace that you intend to distribute and/or sell, then it is more complicated. Obviously you can't use the copyrighted images in your product without permission. But can you use the images in a product prototype or mockup that is shown to potential investors or focus groups? This would almost certainly not count as fair use, but if you are only doing private viewings, and you make it clear that those images are placeholders, you probably won't attract any trouble.

If you want to avoid any problems, then find a starving art student that would love to be paid to create images for you. There are sure to be plenty around.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .