A brief Oxford law dictionary entry on Wednesbury unreasonableness mentions that

recent cases indicate that the standard of unreasonableness may be applied with varying degrees of stringency. In cases involving matters of government policy or public expenditure, the courts are reluctant to intervene and tend to apply a more stringent standard of unreasonableness, referred to as super-Wednesbury. A less stringent standard is applied in cases where human rights are at issue, referred to as sub-Wednesbury (R v Ministry of Defence, ex p Smith [1996] QB 517 (CA).

What is the relevant case law for super-Wednesbury and the criteria it set out? (The source ony cites something for sub-Wednesbury.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.