My friend's beauty salon and beauty product shop was inspected some time ago and in the inspection report it is noted "Surveillance camera in the shop".

Now I am wondering what the inspector might have actually meant with that note on her inspection result? Is there a law that requires notice to be posted?

I can't find anything in http://www.barbercosmo.ca.gov/laws_regs/act_regs.pdf regarding cameras so it might be mentioned under different regulations.

  • 1
    Is that comment negative? The comment may have just been a positive note on the security of the shop. – jwiz21 Oct 19 '15 at 7:04
  • Why not call the regulator (number and info must be on the report) and ask them? – feetwet Oct 19 '15 at 16:12
  • @jwiz21 I am tempted to think it is a negative comment. My inner feeling says that maybe inspector was expecting to see a notice that would inform customers that once they enter premises they are being monitored – Jonny Oct 19 '15 at 18:05
  • @feetwet I just thought to ask this on stackexchange first because then other people would benefit from the answer as well because it would be "googlable". Where as If I called regulator privately then the answer would not be shared with the rest of the folks using stackexchange.com. – Jonny Oct 19 '15 at 18:13
  • Certainly: You can and are encouraged to answer your own question! – feetwet Oct 19 '15 at 18:19

pretty sure youre ok as long as audio isnt recorded. no reasonable expectation of privacy in a salon. unless youre in a changing room or restroom within the salon.

| improve this answer | |
  • Why would audio matter if there is "no reasonable expectation of privacy" most wiretap laws say there must be an expectation of privacy/ – Sam Sep 30 '16 at 17:12
  • "Pretty sure" is not a citation of appropriate law and regulation. And as pointed out, if video recording is not problematic to privacy or expectation thereof, neither would audio be. – Nij Oct 30 '16 at 10:32
  • @Nij Not necessarily. In some states, such as Massachusetts, the secret recording of a person's voice is generally a felony ("wiretapping", MGL ch. 269 s. 99), whether or not it is done in public or with "expectation of privacy", and video recording is regulated differently. – Upnorth Aug 21 '17 at 4:27
  • I'm not sure how you could "secretly record" someone who's looking at a big sign with SURVEILLANCE IN OPERATION on it.. – Nij Aug 21 '17 at 6:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.