• There is a controlled crosswalk.
  • The walking sign is on.

Rather than cross the street via the path, you cross adjacent to it OR you cross at an angle initially and enter the path.

If a car is driving through the crosswalk at this time, do you have right-of-way?

  • Jurisdiction matters here, which country you're discussing? – Peteris Mar 17 '20 at 10:30
  • USA.This happened to me actually. I was crossing the street at an angle towards the crosswalk, so I wasn't on the crosswalk. The signal said walk, and a car drove through the crosswalk and bumped into me. – confusedpanda1 Mar 17 '20 at 10:32
  • The regulation of road traffic is a matter of state law in the United States. In what state did this occur? – phoog Mar 17 '20 at 12:46
  • In Ohio, the crosswalk does not only include the area marked as such: codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511. Depending on where you actually walked, you may have been in the crosswalk all along. – phoog Mar 17 '20 at 23:20

i was hit the other day when crossing. the walk signal was on, but i was crossing at an angle towards the crosswalk. the car bumped into me slowly so the driver would have seen me. was i wrong?

It will depend on the exact state law - but in New Jersey for example assuming you weren't actually on the crosswalk when you were hit you would be jaywalking and would be required to yield right-of-way to the vehicle (emphasis mine):

Always cross at corners, within marked crosswalks where available.

If crossing in other locations, yield the right of way to vehicles. Failure to obey the law carries a $54 fine (court costs additional; C.39:4-32, 33)

  • this was ohio. i read that when the signal say walk, i can walk across the roadway. didnt see a distinction about within the lines or not – confusedpanda1 Mar 17 '20 at 14:14
  • @confusedpanda1 Nope - in Ohio I believe the same applies, if you are outside a marked crosswalk you have to yield to drivers not the other way around. – motosubatsu Mar 17 '20 at 14:36
  • @confusedpanda1 the law almost certainly says you must cross in a crosswalk when you get the walk signal. You were likely jaywalking. – Andy Mar 17 '20 at 18:16
  • @Andy but a jaywalking pedestrian is not a free target for the driver of a motor vehicle. Even if the pedestrian is crossing illegally, the driver has an obligation to "exercise due care" to avoid hitting the pedestrian (at least in New York). – phoog Mar 17 '20 at 23:04
  • @phoog Sorry, but where did I say they were free targets? Whether or not the driver has an obligation not to hit a pedestrian does not make the jaywalkers actions legal. Depending on the local law, they may also be considered at fault when determining liabilities because they broke the law. – Andy Mar 17 '20 at 23:06

Pedestrians always have right if way

Hit a pedestrian - go to jail. Unless it was impossible to avoid the collision such as a pedestrian suddenly stepping out within the car’s best stopping distance and assuming the driver was driving to the conditions (not doing 100 in a 50 zone).

The pedestrian can be booked but they still have right of way.

  • i was hit the other day when crossing. the walk signal was on, but i was crossing at an angle towards the crosswalk. the car bumped into me slowly so the driver would have seen me. was i wrong? – confusedpanda1 Mar 17 '20 at 10:26
  • @confusedpanda1 the USA is weird - everywhere else it’s the driver’s responsibility to never hit a pedestrian – Dale M Mar 17 '20 at 10:39
  • @DaleM that's true in the US, too. Why would you think it isn't? – phoog Mar 17 '20 at 12:44
  • 1
    I wouldn’t say they have the right of way - but you are not allowed to drive into pedestrians whether they have the right of way or not. – gnasher729 Mar 17 '20 at 15:00
  • 2
    This is wrong. A driver is obligated not to hit a pedestrian, but that does not always give them the right of way. It may be that both parties are ruled at fault. And i think there are actually some states that have a "first one to break the law loses " law, but i don't know how that would affect things. Certainly in my state there have been cases of drivers not being charged fir hitting a pedestrian because the pedestrian broke the law and there was no way for the driver to react in time. – Andy Mar 17 '20 at 18:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.