If I make a painting based on someone's photo (nature photography) and it is recognisable, do I have to pay to the author of the photo (or do I breach any copyright law), or is it enough that I mention that the painting is inspired by this photo and give the author's name?
1 Answer
"Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work."
Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf
So if you have not been granted authorization, you are violating the right of the owner. It's always recommended that you get permission. Practically speaking, if the owner does not give you permission, there is probably someone else with a similar photo who will!
Pretty famous recent case: Barack Obama "Hope" poster
-
Could you point me to a basic release template that I could give the photographer to sign? So I can use his work as inspiration, but earn on selling my painting based on the photo. I think it's wise to have a document, not just rely on email correspondence.– AardoCommented Nov 10, 2015 at 10:36