0

I have attempted to learn what I can (IANAL) from reading the article: Conflict of Laws Principles: Everything You Need to Know.

The article indicates multiple (2+ jurisdictions).

Conflict of laws signifies the difference between the laws of two or more jurisdictions that are applicable to a dispute in question. that are applicable to a dispute in question.

If there are two conflicting state laws of the same jurisdiction (for example both in Florida):

  • is nomenclature different (i.e. not "Conflict of Laws" and is labeled "XYZ")
  • are the principles for determining which law applies the same with said Florida example

A good answer would walk through the thought process of the example provided at: HOA meetings transcripts

3
  • For what it's worth, it turns out the question about the HOA meetings isn't a representative example of the situation you're asking about here. law.stackexchange.com/a/51964/12269
    – A.fm.
    Jun 1 '20 at 5:19
  • @A.fm Could you please clarify why the reason why the HOA example is not representative? Is it b/c your posting indicates an exception? Thank you
    – gatorback
    Jun 1 '20 at 13:07
  • Essentially, yes. Your scenario speaks to a situation where two laws within the same jurisdiction conflict with one another. In the HOA question/example, there are no laws presented which conflict with one another.
    – A.fm.
    Jun 1 '20 at 13:37
2

"Conflict of Laws" refers only to competing jurisdictional issues, not laws within a single jurisdiction which appear to "conflict" with each other.

Competing jurisdictional issues arise where more than one jurisdiction applies. A good example is where a party resides in one state, but the subject matter of the lawsuit occurred in another state. How to decide the issue is a matter of continuing legal evolution. Your article is generally accurate as far as it goes, but there's many pages of legal opinion written as to what constitutes a procedural vs. a substantive matter.

With regard to different laws of a single jurisdiction, deciding which law applies is called "litigation." I'm trying to be funny, but I'm not joking. Legal and factual research combine to persuade a judge that the law more favorable to you is the one that should be applied.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.