2

If a victim submits fake photographs as evidence and said photographs are proven to be edited pictures, would that qualify for dismissing a case?

3

Not necessarily. Let's say the victim delivered photos of a harm that were alleged to be done by the defendant. That's a crime in itself. But based on this item the DA orders investigation and finds evidence of a real crime.

Discovering that the photo was faked can lead to dismissal (with prejudice), but even without the fake photo, there might be a strong case against defendant.

Also, the photo could not even be used as evidence in the actual trial stage. A good defense attorney might manage to convince the judge, that the doctored photo should have been discovered such early in the investigation, but I doubt, that one could manage to make everything else in a proper investigation fruit of the poisoned tree unless police screwed up.

| improve this answer | |
  • Trish, what do you mean "That's a crime in itself." Are you saying that the submission of fake photos is a crime? If so, what crime is that? – Breakskater Jul 29 at 4:38
  • @Breakskater that depends on what the police makes out of t. "filing a false police record" can be just as much a possibility as libel. Note that I started with the submission of the photo to the police/DA, while a lawsuit only starts once the DA decides the case is enough. As in the state prosecution. – Trish Jul 29 at 5:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.