In International law, the subjects, unlike that of national law, are the nation-states themselves. In this way, can we say that in temporal law here, there being no higher power, must be horizontal here rather than the vertical form it takes within a nation-state. Then we ought to consider nation-states in toto, as the de facto legislature, even if not de jure; that is in customary and positive law, as opposed to law itself.

Q. Is this an accurate description of how international law differed from domestic law in nation-states?



International law is a web of multilateral and bilateral treaties and custom. There is no legislature, there are merely sovereign states agreeing between themselves what the law is.

  • Or Rather: should be in many cases, then the members build on that for national laws
    – Trish
    Nov 23 '20 at 11:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.