I have read a number of accounts of the details involved, most of which resemble this one, and are biased against the BLM. I have yet to find information on what position the BLM took in changing the land-use in that area.

The primary cause of arresting the landowners involves seems to be a claim of arson, but I am asking about the land-use dynamics that constructed the relationship between landowners and federal/state government parties.

Does anyone have a picture of the facets of this situation?

In a DOI / BLM land use situation, what precedents exist for similar regional initiatives?

  • I'm trying to best formulate a valuable question; please suggest edits. Commented Jan 4, 2016 at 4:48


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .