In a contract, what's the difference between a clause, provision, condition and term? They seem to all refer to the same thing to me - which is basically any self contained point or requirement.


They have subtle differences. Starting with the Oxford Dictionary definitions (using the one most appropriate for a legal context):


2.a particular and separate article, stipulation, or proviso in a treaty, bill, or contract.

A clause is a self-contained concept within the written contract; it may have a number of subclauses. It may reference other clauses but ideally it can be read and acted on on its own. Typical contracts will contain clauses on payment, time, termination, scope etc. It is a feature of the drafting of the contract document.


3.a condition or requirement in a legal document: "the first private prosecution under the provisions of the 1989 Water Act"

A provision is any condition (q.v.) or stipulation of things to be done or not be done within the contract. A provision may correspond with a clause, may span several clauses or be contained wholly within a subclause. It is a feature of the contract itself: verbal contracts will have provisions but they will not have clauses.


3.a state of affairs that must exist or be brought about before something else is possible or permitted: "for a member to borrow money, three conditions have to be met"

A condition is a set of circumstances that must arise before another action can occur. There can be a "condition precedent" which means the condition must be satisfied before there is a contract. There can (will) also be conditions within the contract, for example, there will be conditions that must be satisfied before payment is made (like issuing an invoice). Conditions are a creature of the contract not the drafting.


4.(terms) conditions under which an action may be undertaken or agreement reached; stipulated or agreed requirements: "their solicitors had agreed terms"

(I don't like this definition much but it is the best they had.)

A term is a provision (q.v.) in the contract for which one of the possible remedies for breach is termination of the contract by the innocent party . A provision where termination is not an available remedy is a warranty.

  • What's the difference between "proviso" vs "condition" then? – Pacerier Sep 23 '16 at 8:25
  • @Pacerier proviso is an abbreviation of provision – Dale M Sep 23 '16 at 9:05
  • @Pacerier "proviso" is not an abbreviation of "provision." It is a shortened form of the Latin phrase "proviso quod," meaning "provided that." So it does mean the same thing as "provision," but the word itself is not derived from the word "provision." – phoog Apr 19 at 21:34

The terminology regrettably suffers from some equivocation, in large part due to relaxed, lay usage. The words "provision" and "clause" are often used interchangeably even by legal professionals when referring to a particular item or matter expressly and directly stipulated in a written law or legal instrument and intended to have legal effect. "Term" and "condition" are utilized in this broader sense as well but generally when pertaining to contracts. There are, nevertheless, distinct nuances in the terminology worth highlighting.

"Provision" is the proper "umbrella" word that denotes the broader meaning described above (i.e. a particular item or matter expressly and directly stipulated in a written law or legal instrument and intended to have legal effect). A provision can be a clause, term, condition, article, section, sub-section, and so forth. It can be a short sentence or in theory consist of volumes of pages filling an entire room. Note, however, that this definition excludes expressed statements that do not directly stipulate a matter intended to have legal effect (e.g. some sort of an aside not intended to have legal effect or other items in a document that indirectly have legal significance perhaps by reference, incorporation, or other law such as a list of named parties, an address, a signature, exhibits, etc.). A document, of course, may specifically label items as provisions, in which case that designation will control.

A clause is a provision or set of provisions that stipulate specific rights or duties. They are also oftentimes labeled so in legal documents or through conventional usage (for example the "Commerce Clause" and "Supremacy Clause" of the U.S. Constitution).

A term meanwhile is a provision or set of provisions that stipulate a meaning, generally with the intent to avoid ambiguities. The prototypical example is the definitions section (provision) in a legal document, but they can appear within any other type of provision (which adds to the overall confusion). Alternatively, "term" can refer to a specific period of time designated in a provision.

A condition (which is of primary concern in contracts law and is thus defined accordingly) is an event the occurrence of which suspends or excuses a party's contractual duty to perform. Conditions are usually expressed in a provision/clause (aka "expressed condition") but may also be implied in law (aka "construction condition"; see for example the ever-important "constructive condition of exchange"). They are also categorized in temporal terms as a condition precedent (one that, if not satisfied, discharges a contractual obligation), condition subsequent (one that, once satisfied, discharges a contractual obligation), or concurrent condition (one that, if not satisfied simultaneously with the other, discharges a contractual obligation). Conditions have legal effect only once a contract is formed, including the condition precedent. The main issue here is performance of the contract. The condition is the real meat of what one negotiates in a contract, viz. the tradeoff of obligations/duties for their respective benefits/rights. Terms simply add clarity to those conditions. Nevertheless, this distinction is lost on many to the point that the phrase "terms & conditions" is likely to appear redundant. Consider also the case when one is asked to state their terms. What they are really asking for is one's conditions... so correct them ;)


Provision is the name ("Title") that identifies the purpose of that specific language of contract.

Example : 1. Indemnification is the provision NEXT the clause is what is written after the provision "Here is this contract indemnify my liability such as..." < Clause can be a phrase, sentence or the entire provision depending on how it is written>. You can say Provision 1 or Clause 1 both mean the same however clause refers to what is written not the title. You can always argue the clause is wrong for the contract provision and is a invalid contract. That's the very detailed difference more legal details.

A Chapter is a specific condition: A Condition without a chapter is the unspecific phrase of that provision. You can write a contract as "conditions set forth" or just write the conditions. Example: Provision 1 Indemnification and now for the clause "Here is this contract indemnify my liability such as... (conditions)". When you write chapters and sub chapters in a contract those are specific Conditions -> Chapter (A) Specific Conditions -> Sub Chapter(A)(1) is the rules defined among the provision and clause.

A Term is the definitions or words in the contract or a time length or consequence such as deadlines or limitations. Term describes the purpose and conditions.

Definitions "Liability" in this contract means green every term of liability is a Green Agreement or whatever you want the contract to detail. No matter what you write. The name of the clause will always be a provision even if named conditions or clause.

Every contract to be with legal enforcement- must have ( Offer , Acceptance and last Meeting of the Minds) ("Agreement & Equity or Fairness") without having the acts of ( Fraud , Deception , Duress).

Depending on State or Federal Law (system)- Will tweak contracts when law mandates certain things be in writing or fairness or legally the legislature defined terms of a contract and how it must be written legally because what the law mandates. Sometimes legislature can narrow this down to how the legislation should apply to local government or business world contracts.

(Ambiguity , Peculiarity , Intent , Stipulations) are legal arguments not legal meanings of a contract. A party disagrees about a stipulation then you go to court to prove a Stipulation. That is a legal argument not a legal meaning. You cannot have legal argument(s) about a contract provision (you may personally disagree with the name of the provision but having a wrong written contract is not the same as having a legal argument against the contract) No body disputes the provision language (clause, conditions, terms) in the contract. The contract is valid by legal technicality. You can argue the provisions / clause has (Ambiguity , Peculiarity , certain Intent, Stipulations ) however , the title of the book remains the title.

Clarify about Stipulation in legal world. Stipulations means one party can prove both parties agree to a fact without proving them (for example): if small claims waiver is not in a contract you go to small claims no party disagree with going to small claims you both stipulated the fact the contract limited dispute value is at the award cap of small claims. Do not confuse stipulation as a contract legal building. Stipulations is a verb which means its action demanding in an agreement/contract. Stipulation usually reefers to party underlying consequences in the written contract either written or not. These are NOT what makes the contract blue prints.

Apply those lexicon definitions to legal world and how this is written structurally. It will clarify so much !

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.