1

Here are the facts of a hypothetical case.

A is an Austrian wholesaler that imports and distributes party fireworks to retailers. A set up stalls in several Christmas markets in Ireland where A sells its products directly to consumers. In a raid in November 2018, the Irish police seized all A’s products, shut down its stalls, and arrested A’s staff selling its products.

In January 2019, A was prosecuted under sections 1-3 of the fictitious Pyrotechnics Act. s 1 requires retailers of pyrotechnic products to possess a licence, but A did not possess one. s 2 requires all fireworks to be stored in government-approved storage facilities, but A stored fireworks in a rented barn which the government never approved. s 3 prohibits individual customers from buying more than one firework at a time, and the police video-recorded A selling multiple fireworks to the same customer.

How can EU law assist A’s defence?

I noted what my law teacher said — s 1 doesn't restrict the EU Freedom to Provide Services. But she didn't explain. Why not?

1
  • 2
    How are we to know why your law teacher didnt explain...?
    – user28517
    May 20 '21 at 5:08
6

Because the Austrian has equal rights to an Irish wholesaler wrt fireworks

The freedom to provide services means that a national of any EU country has the same rights as a national of any other EU country including the home country. However, they all must still comply with local law.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy