Can I legally use static vector images downloaded from freepik or pixabay to create my own animations and then sell them? Their license terms are a bit confusing for me. They say that I can use those assets in personal and commercial projects as long as I include attribution. But at the same time they disallow selling any "derived work". Do my animations count as derived work?

What if I buy a pro account on these services, which frees me from including any attribution. Can I then create and sell such animations?


License to use does not mean license to create derivative works

These are different rights under copyright. If you want to make a derivative work, which your animations are, you must have a license to do so.

  • Thank you... so if I use those vector files in a website (after re-coloring, cropping etc.), that will not be seen as derived work?
    – dotNET
    Jun 14 at 8:20
  • 1
    Yes it would be
    – Dale M
    Jun 14 at 11:06
  • Then what does it even mean that I'm allowed to use it in my commercial projects? What am I allowed to do? Can I put that image into a website (without modification) and sell the website, but I can't sell the image (or the website) if I have modified the original image?
    – dotNET
    Jun 14 at 12:29
  • @dotNET yes - exactly
    – Dale M
    Jun 14 at 20:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.