This is my case. Are there legal reasons that Shopping Centre Landlord (NWD in my case) alleges that a vacancy is unavailable to me, but let Commercial Realtors (CBRE in my case) lease THE SAME VACANCY to me? Possible that Landlord contracted away some of Landlord's liability to CBRE? Then Landlord will want CBRE to lease vacancy — and not lease directly to me — because CBRE can reduce Landlord's liability.
I know that if CBRE introduces a Tenant that gets into legal issues, CBRE can lose face, reputation in Landlord's eyes. Landlord will loathe, lose confidence in CBRE. But CBRE can't sue Landlord just because CBRE loses reputation???
Tenant can breach Tenancy Agreement by pay rent late, arrear, go bankrupt, skip rent and disappear!