Context:a Florida HOA bylaws indicate:
The passage below indicates may
:
Special meetings of the Board
may
be called by the president on five(5)days notice to each Director either personally or by mail , facsimile transmission or electronic mail. Special meetings shall be called by the president or secretary in a like manner and on like notice on the written request of three (3) Directors.
A subsequent passage below indicates shall
:
Meetings ofthe Board of Administration
shall
be open to all unit owners. Notice of all meetings shall be posted on the official bulletin board ofthe Association at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of each scheduled meeting and directed to the attention of all unit owners. In case of an emergency, a meeting of the Board of Administration may be held without notice.
Assume that a meeting minutes are provided as evidence. It would seem that the language using may
is a permissive and not a requirement.
Assume a 'corner case': a meeting is scheduled on the 1st for the 4th of a given month. Is there any case law or any other reasoning process that wherein may
nullifies such a meeting and effectively sets a requirement? Assume that meeting is posted with 48 hours notice so that only the shall / may language is the focus of any answer to the question.
may
sets forth a requirement. Is there an a concrete example? If yes, please consider creating an answer instead of a comment.