Is there a law in California about the verbiage used in financial transaction language regarding the need to use the language "3 months" instead of "90 days"?

I was told that this is the case, but I cannot find can't reference to it.


Need to use is too strong a claim but 90 days is a different period of time than 3 months.

90 days from 1 July is 29 September but 3 months is 1 October.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.