-1

Nonbinding Arbitration: An order of default is entered. Defense files to set aside the default.

In order to request that the the order of default not be set aside, is it proper (commonplace in the craft) to request that the order be sustained? Or is there a better (concise) word?

Title of document:

1) PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SUSTAIN ORDER OF DEFAULT
2) PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AFFIRM ORDER OF DEFAULT
3) PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CONFIRM ORDER OF DEFAULT
3
  • Please don't use codeblocks for text that is not actual code.
    – user4657
    Commented Jan 27, 2022 at 4:44
  • @Nij Sure. Can I ask why?
    – gatorback
    Commented Jan 28, 2022 at 1:44
  • meta.stackexchange.com/a/301372/341260
    – user4657
    Commented Jan 28, 2022 at 1:48

1 Answer 1

2

It would be more common to ask that the request to set aside be denied or that the order of default be affirmed or confirmed. It probably isn't wrong to say sustained, but that word isn't commonly used outside of evidence objections, and it isn't totally clear if you are talking about sustaining the order of default, or sustaining the objection to the order of default.

2
  • Always good to hear from you. Please consider commenting as to which word you would use and why? Thank you
    – gatorback
    Commented Jan 26, 2022 at 22:13
  • I would ask that their request be denied.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jan 26, 2022 at 22:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .