Is it legal for a woman who writes a religious blog to not allow men to access the site because of a belief that women should not teach men about religion?

  • 1
    Why do you think owners of blogs can't restrict who has access? Sep 21, 2022 at 17:03
  • 2
    I would suppose for the same reason that the owner of a motel, grocery store, school, taxi... are limited in how they can restrict access.
    – user6726
    Sep 21, 2022 at 18:35
  • @user6726 the difference is: in a physical store you can actually can physically do such a control, while on the internet it can't even be done properly at all without the user actually helping the page to do so.
    – Trish
    Sep 28, 2022 at 16:37

2 Answers 2


That depends what is meant by "not allow".

Such a blog author could certainly include a statement that the blog was intended only for female readers. That would not be enforceable. She could include a ToS provision requiring a user to agree to such a restriction. That might be enforceable in theory, but it would be a lot of work to try to enforce, as a blog author does not normally know who her readers are.

Such an author could have the blog require registration and log-in, and as part of the registration process require registrants to provide evidence that they are females. That might work to keep (at least most) males from directly reading the blog.

If we suppose that the author had such a registration process, and someone brought suit under a federal or state anti-discrimination law, what would happen? Such laws usually only apply to "places of public accommodation". Such laws have mostly been employed to address discrimination in hotels, restaurants, theaters, retail stores, and similar places. I am not aware of any case declaring a blog or any similar online service a "public accommodation". Such a finding would be needed for a suit in such a case to be won by the plaintiff.

There are also specific laws prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing, and education. But those would not apply to this sort of case.

So I am inclined to doubt that any such restriction, if imposed by a blog author, would be found to violate US anti-discrimination law.

  • It also depends on what is meant by "men"... Sep 22, 2022 at 2:44
  • 1
    it would most certainly be an unenforceable clause in the ToS, as it isn't really noticeable there and nobody would expect it to be there.
    – Trish
    Sep 28, 2022 at 16:38
  • 1
    @Trish Such a provision could be made prominent through sn enlsrged font, boldface, boxing, or other display techniques. It could even have a separate acceptance checkbox. Sep 28, 2022 at 17:13
  • @DavidSiegel under EU law, it has to be boldly written before you access the main page. Hidden in the ToS is unenforceable, and even such a disclaimer on a bannar might be held unenforceable on its own.
    – Trish
    Sep 28, 2022 at 19:29

At least w.r.t. federal law, they can. Although there are laws against discrimination in public accommodations (Title II of the Civil Rights Act), sex is not a protected category. So we don't have to raise the question of whether a website is a "public accommodation". W.r.t. a different anti-discrimination law (ADA: title III), there is some legal murk over whether a public accommodation has to be a physical location, but so far websites have not been forced to comply with other anti-discrimination laws.

States may have their own anti-discrimination laws, but as far as I know, no state has attempted to regulate websites. All websites are "in interstate commerce", and one state cannot regulate commerce by another state, only the federal government can regulate interstate commerce.

Needless to say, a significant First Amendment issue would be at stake with such a law.

  • 1
    "no state has attempted to regulate websites." Lots of states regulate conduct which can occur on websites. For example, if had a discriminatory apartment rental website on a webpage, that could be the basis for a discrimination lawsuit. Given the religious basis of this claim though, I doubt discrimination laws would apply. CA, TX and FL all have law specifically regulating some kinds of websites.
    – ohwilleke
    Sep 21, 2022 at 23:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .