1

Reading https://www.tax-rates.org/california/san-francisco-income-tax it seems to suggest that my employer is liable to pay a 1.50% tax on my income due to me living in San Francisco despite the offices being in another location of the Bay. Will they pass down that cost to me by deducting the corresponding amount from my paycheck or is that illegal?

1
  • Probably better asked to your company's payroll dept.
    – jwh20
    Nov 21, 2022 at 13:20

2 Answers 2

3

The tax in question does not exist.

San Francisco does not have a local income tax. It used to have a 1.5 percent payroll tax, but that tax was repealed and replaced with a gross receipts tax in 2020.

Generally, though, an income tax is a tax on your income, and you are the only one receiving income in the transaction where your employer writes you a check.

The income tax is therefore your tax to pay, and the employer has no cost to pass down to you. It is merely obligated to withhold the tax from your paycheck and remit it to the government on your behalf, no different than the taxes that it withholds and remits to the IRS to satisfy your federal income tax obligations.

A payroll tax, on the other hand, is a tax on the employer's payroll, which the employer would not have been able to "pass down" to you, at least not directly by docking your pay. Indirectly, though, it is probably axiomatic that these taxes eventually get passed on to the employees one way or another. If the employer's costs go up, it is quite common for the employer insulate his own pay by not only increasing prices but by offering lower salaries, delaying raises, or reducing bonuses.

5
  • "The San Francisco local income tax is imposed on employers, not employees"
    – A. Fenzry
    Nov 22, 2022 at 6:23
  • 1
    @A.Fenzry I can write anything in a comment and put it in quotes but that doesn't mean it's true. Please provide the source for your claim, and consider whether it's authoritative.
    – Stuart F
    Nov 22, 2022 at 12:20
  • @A.Fenzry I've updated the answer.
    – bdb484
    Nov 22, 2022 at 13:29
  • bdb484, Could you please link to, or quote, a source for the fact that the SF income tax has been repealed. Also it is worth noting that something that is actually a payroll tax may be carelessly described as an income tax. This seems to have happened in the web page linked in the question. Nov 22, 2022 at 16:36
  • The income tax never existed in the first place, as far as I can tell. For information on the payroll tax repeal, one can search for "Proposition E" and Proposition F."
    – bdb484
    Nov 22, 2022 at 18:05
2

An "income tax" is levied on employees; it may be directly withheld by employers from the employee's gross wages or may be paid directly by employees, but in either case it's the employee's money being paid, and the requirement to pay is generally based on the employee's circumstances (in particular, where they live and where they work) rather than, say, where the employer is incorporated.

A tax which is levied on employers based on how much they're paying employees, and not reflected as a deduction from gross wages, is generally referred to as a "payroll tax". However, some taxes which are deducted from the employee's gross wages, such as Medicare and Social Security contributions, are also considered "payroll taxes".

3
  • "The San Francisco local income tax is imposed on employers, not employees"
    – A. Fenzry
    Nov 22, 2022 at 6:23
  • @A.Fenzry you’re misreading that random, outdated web page.
    – Sneftel
    Nov 22, 2022 at 9:53
  • so in layman terms, I'm liable for this tax myself and I need to make sure I properly pay this 1.50% tax if my company hasn't taken care of it originally?
    – A. Fenzry
    Nov 23, 2022 at 4:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .