The Indian Penal Code states that
physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures
is guilty of sexual harassment. Pikewise, POCSO act sections 7 and 11 state
Whoever, with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anus or breast of the child or makes the child touch the vagina, penis, anus or breast of such person or any other person, or does any other act with sexual intent which involves physical contact without penetration is said to commit sexual assault.
A person is said to commit sexual harassment upon a child when such person with sexual intent,-- (i) utters any word or makes any sound, or makes any gesture or exhibits any object or part of body with the intention that such word or sound shall be heard, or such gesture or object or part of body shall be seen by the child;
How is sexual intent proven or disproven in the 2 cases? In the latter case the burden of proving a lack of intent is on the accused, while in the former case I think it's not. Nevertheless, the two provisions are similar due to "sexual intent" being used. How is this proven and disproven?