If a landlord enters residential premises without receiving a judgment for possession and without the presence of a Special Civil Part Officer what recourse does the tenant have USA?

Can they be charged with trespassing?

Illegal lockout? Does one file a complaint in Special Civil Court or with the police department?

In this case the landlord is trying to evict the tenant in Special Civil Court but the landlord refuses to wait until the judge orders the eviction.

  • Good question. I'd have to research to know the answer as it isn't uniform in all U.S. states. In many U.S. states, a court order of possession is a safe harbor that avoids liability for wrongful eviction but not an absolute requirement if this can be accomplished without a breach of the peace. Other jurisdictions require an order of possession in all cases. I don't know where NJ stands on that question.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Mar 13, 2023 at 20:14
  • Why would the landlord need to pick the lock? The landlord would normally have a key. If the landlord is picking the lock because the tenant replaced the lock without authorization, that would generally have an impact on the legality of the entry. Commented Apr 4, 2023 at 19:55

3 Answers 3


All of this is from the Residential Tenancy Act and related decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch (a delegate of the director).

A tenant is entitled to exclusive possession subject only to the landlord's limited right of entry, described next.

As long as there is a tenancy, the landlord cannot enter unless:

  • the tenant consents, or
  • the landlord gives 24 hours notice and enters between 8am and 9pm (up to monthly), or
  • the landlord is providing agreed-upon housekeeping services, or
  • the landlord has an order of the director authorizing entry, or
  • the tenant has abandonned the unit, or
  • an emergency exists.

If satisfied that the landlord will enter other than as authorized above, the director can authorize the tenant to change the locks.

If a landlord does not comply with the Act, the director can make orders to give effect to the tenant's rights, and can award compensation. One such possible award, where the tenant can establish that the landlord is trespassing contrary to the permitted entry described above, is retroactive rent decrease, consistent with the loss of a right to exclusive possession.


For a few years, I was an unwilling landlord for a property down in Florida, which I contracted with a property manager to handle on my behalf.

As part of that arrangement, they drafted the lease, which included a clause to permit entry by the landlord, which stated:

Landlord and Agents shall have the right at all reasonable times, and by all reasonable means, given reasonable notice, during the term of this Lease and any renewal thereof to enter the Premises for the following purposes...

I've omitted the listed reasons, but they relate to things inspections of the property, repairs, efforts to sell the property, and to leave notices. Failure by the tenant to permit these inspections render the tenant to be in default.

Note, that there are no specific time tables provided, in part because there are many things that warrant inspection on short notice. For example, if a pipe breaks, we need to be able to enter the property immediately. However, for most anything else, we would notice via e-mail or phone call 48 hours in advance. Presuming an amiable relationship, the tenant could shift this timetable, however, the right to inspect the property was always important.

To address your specific question, "If a landlord enters residential premises without receiving a judgement for possession and without the presence of a Special Civil Part Officer what recourse does the tenant have (in NJ)?"

I'm not sure for NJ, however, for Florida it's doubtful we could be charged with trespass. We have a right to be on the property pursuant to the lease. We could not change the locks without notifying the tenant without a court order, however, we could change the locks pursuant to the terms of the lease; for example we'd need to give the tenant a copy of the new key, however, if the tenant is non-responsive to notices they might not be able to claim their new key.

Bear in mind, there are multiple other elements in the lease which can give rise to justify an inspection by the landlord in an eviction proceeding including, but not limited to: affirming status of the unit at any point during the eviction process (if you damage it, we will want that damage included in the judgement), ensuring that standard maintenance is occurring (we don't want the unit to become someone's personal landfill), ensuring that the property is not abandoned (a common occurrence in an eviction), ensuring that the property isn't being subletted (another common occurrence in an eviction).

Literally every single thing I listed in the above paragraph occurred during an eviction I had on the property. For those reasons, we want to be able to access the property. And if the property manager I hired is to be believed, it's legal for us to access at any time pursuant to the lease they drafted.

For the record, I had little interest in pestering my tenant provided the rent was paid on time. The only times we'd enter the unit during normal circumstances were for maintenance and once a year to conduct an inspection. Things are notably different if we've elected to resort to eviction.

  • Note that your example contract also requires 'reasonable means'. Whether picking the locks is reasonable will depend on the specific circumstances of your desire for access and presumably needs to be justified on a case-by-case basis.
    – quarague
    Commented Mar 29, 2023 at 7:58
  • @quarague I would note that a tenant changing locks without providing a copy to the landlord would be something that substantially impedes the property owner from reasonably accessing the property. If we needed to access the property for some reason pursuant to the terms of the lease and found that the locks were changed without a copy being given to us, that would likely be grounds for us to hire a locksmith to pick the lock (since the alternative would result in substantial damage to the property). Commented Mar 29, 2023 at 13:40

Landlord commits an indictable criminal offence under protection from eviction act 1977 s1, liable on conviction to two years imprisonment and unlimited, usually quite substantial damages, and other penalties.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .