1

I often browse web sites that offer me contract terms via "browse-wrap": there is a link on the page to a "Terms of Service" or similar, and my browsing the web site, having had notice that there are terms that apply, forms a contract between me and the server operator.

But the HTTP protocol sends information two ways; a response can contain a link to a page of terms, but a web request can also contain a link to a page of terms.

If I configure my web browser to send notice of a contract offer and set of terms to the operators of the web sites I visit, as part of my web requests, and propose that the server operator can accept my terms by replying to my web request (or otherwise allowing me to browse the site), and the web site operator returns the information I requested and allows me to browse the site as normal, have the server operator and I formed a contract?

If not, why not?

8
  • 1
    "...web site operator returns the information I requested .." Are you talking about the actual human behind the website who responds, or are you talking about the simple automated http response that responds to all http requests? Commented May 24, 2023 at 15:05
  • 1
    I your question may already be covered in Is a contract valid if one of the party doesn't even read it?.
    – Brian
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 16:27
  • "and my browsing the web site, having had notice that there are terms that apply, forms a contract between me and the server operator" that seems like something that would never hold up in court in the first place, making your question moot.
    – nvoigt
    Commented May 25, 2023 at 5:15
  • @nvoigt you would think so, but within limits courts have apparently upheld this method of contract formation. See for example law.stackexchange.com/a/84812
    – interfect
    Commented Jun 2, 2023 at 15:03
  • @BlueDogRanch I mean the legal person here, I think, who is sending the response, with the assistance of their server software. They in many cases have already empowered that software to form contracts with me on their behalf, by having it host terms and saying a contract is formed if I interact with it in certain ways. And they empower my browser software to form contracts with them; I don't seem to be able to say that I don't accept sending my browser to a site as a method of contract formation.
    – interfect
    Commented Jun 2, 2023 at 15:10

0

You must log in to answer this question.