Assume that around 1911 a utility sewer is laid down on private land with an easement that was limited “until a public sewer pipe be built”, with the document being properly filed. Such a construction never happens and the easement eventually is forgotten to be put on the title documents to the house on the register.

Now, the house is sold without notice of that easement. It comes back up when the water company actually comes along a year after the sale to do some work on the pipe they have the easement to. However, a copy of the easement document can be located, dated and filed in some old drawer of some registry.

Can this easement be revoked or is it forever?

  • To clarify, in your opening paragraph you indicate that a 'utility sewer' is laid down with an associated easement. In your second paragraph, you indicate that the 'water company' is working on the pipe. Is the pipe a sanitary sewer with associated easement being accessed by a potable water company? Or is the pipe for potable water with an associated easement being accessed by a potable water company? Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:33
  • A sewer line that the utility potable water company needs to service every time there’s a sewer backup anywhere on the block.
    – Sarah
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:46
  • Does the potable water company own the sewer line? To clarify, some utility companies own both potable water lines as well as sanitary sewer lines. If this is the case then they're both a potable water utility and a sanitary sewer utility. This is relevant because a lot of times easements are really specific in how they can be used. Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:52
  • In the easement, the sewer line is described as privately owned by owner. The easement grants the water company access to the premises until a public sewer be built.
    – Sarah
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:57
  • The utility company is both water and sewer.
    – Sarah
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 22:02

3 Answers 3


While this question was initially posed as a request for legal advice, I've stated some general principles of this kind of situation generically.

You are deemed to have "constructive notice" for legal purposes of all documents filed in the public record pertaining to your property whether you know it or not.

You are also on notice of anything that a reasonably informed person could assume to exist from observable facts (like that existence of municipal water and sewer service) upon an inspection of the property. In terms of reasonable expectations, almost every urban home is subject to multiple utility easements. If your home has (or most homes in your neighborhood have) municipal water service, municipal sewer service, electrical service, and cable or telephone lines, there are almost certainly easement in place for all of these things.

Typically, in a contract for the purchase of real estate, there is a fixed deadline for you (or a title company on your behalf) to review the public record to find what is there. If you don't object by that deadline to any title issues, you can't get out of the real estate contract or undo it.

Typically, the deed from the seller will contain an exclusion from the warranty of title for "all easement of record."

If the title insurance policy contains an exclusion for easements, you can't make a claim against that title insurance policy.

Even if there weren't an easement in the public real property records, anything that has been there since 1911 would benefit from a "prescriptive easement" which is the equivalent of adverse possession a.k.a. squatter's rights, for easements. In New Jersey, for example, the prescriptive easement time period is usually twenty years and never more than sixty years.

Furthermore, utilities usually have the power, delegated to them by the government that grants them permission to operate or by the state, to create new easements at the very modest price associated with a reduction in fair market value caused by the easement. This is often estimated to be half of the fair market value of the unimproved land per square foot times the actual square footage occupied by the utility when it isn't working on its infrastructure.

Easements, once established, run with the land, and generally can't be removed without the permission of the party for whose benefit the easement is granted a.k.a. the owner of the dominant estate (in legal terminology, the utility's rights in the easement are called the "dominant estate" and the home owner's rights in the property subject to the easement are called the "servient estate").

There may be implied in law duties of someone using an easement to restore damage caused after using it, but it wouldn't be worth suing over that for a bit of displaced grass and a rose bush.

  • You may wish to omit the mention of easements for water or sewer from your list. A lot of these utilities have 'curb stops' which occur within or adjacent to the right-of-way and create a discrete point whereby the utility's responsibility is terminated without entering the property. This is why when a sewer line is clogged it becomes relevant to determine if the clog is behind the curb stop or after it. If it's between the house and curb stop, the home owner has to deal with the cost. Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:29
  • 1
    @Pyrotechnical Even though that is the case the utility company very often has some sort of easement to access and possibly repair, even when they aren't responsible for or maintain the line, and also water mains and sewer mains not infrequently run under private house lots served by water and sewer systems (as in this case).
    – ohwilleke
    Commented May 24, 2023 at 21:41

Sewers have statutory easements

That is, wherever the sewer lies, it has an easement that doesn't have to be registered. This does not apply to drains.

A sewer is a pipe or conduit for sewage owned and operated by a statutory body tasked with providing sewerage services; a drain is a pipe for sewage owned and operated by a private person. The drains from your house usually connect to a sewer.

Water utilities have the same benefit for their water mains. However, gas, electricity, and telecommunications utilities don't. Why that is is a historical accident - water and sewerage utilities already existed when the land titles system was developed in New South Wales, but the others are Johnny-come-latelies.

  • Probably a better system than the one in the U.S.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented May 25, 2023 at 16:01
  • @ohwilleke a “no comment” comment in response
    – Dale M
    Commented May 25, 2023 at 20:51

In the Netherlands, you're out of luck.

You're supposed to do proper research about such things before purchasing the property, and property is purchased as is (with a mandatory clause about hidden defects, but that doesn't include things like easements and improper zoning, only construction flaws in the house basically).

That's one reason there is a mandate to use a professional for such transactions, and it's their job to do the research and do it properly. This can turn up things like unlisted easements, improper property boundaries, zoning violations, which can then be corrected in the public record, and may or may not lead to the purchase falling through or the purchase price being adjusted to account for them.

And those notaries do tend to do a proper job. And their job is needed as sometimes mistakes in the public record are found that even the selling party wasn't aware of. For example the notary I used when buying my house told a story where he'd (on another transaction) had found that the garden shed was not on the plot of land being sold, it was zoned separately. The public zoning record was adjusted, the plots were merged, problem solved. Had he not found that, the house'd have been sold but the garden shed would still have belonged to the previous owner.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .