4

Suppose a crime were committed with a very long (or no) statute of limitations, like murder.

The prosecutor has enough physical evidence to charge someone with the crime. However, they know that this person has a believable exculpatory eyewitness. Maybe the father of the murder suspect will testify that he was nowhere near the crime scene.

The prosecutor also knows that for medical reasons the eyewitness will not be able to testify in a few years. Maybe he has a terminal illness, maybe he has some early signs of dementia.

What happens if the prosecutor delays the arrest/indictment until after that eyewitness can no longer testify effectively for the defense? Assume that the arrest is still within the statute of limitations, and that the defense did not have enough warning to obtain a statement from the witness. Is there any recourse for the defense?

And what happens if it is revealed that the prosecutor intentionally delayed the arrest, in order to bolster his case by preventing the witness from testifying?

2
  • 1
    Can't provide a full answer at the moment, but the answer is "maybe." Search for "pre-indictment delay."
    – bdb484
    Commented Jul 8, 2023 at 5:19
  • 1
    Thank you! I found US vs Marion and US vs Barket, which suggested that under these circumstances the defendant might get the charges dismissed under a due process claim. Very helpful!
    – FlowVoid
    Commented Jul 8, 2023 at 19:52

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .