Descriptions of the criteria for defamation seem widely to describe any statement that is communicated to a third party as being defamatory if they are (broadly speaking) false and harmful.

This seems to allow for the possibility that relatively private communications can be deemed defamatory, even though most high-profile defamation cases involve public statements accessible to large if not unlimited audiences. Of course, the smaller the audience the more unusual it seems likely to be that such a communication could meet the serious harm test of the Defamation Act 2013, yet it doesn't seem impossible that the right lie told to the right person could yet have serious enough consequences to be defamatory.

Are there examples of very small-scale communications that have been tested for their ability to defame?

Tagged since inspired by Nigel Farage's claim that internal correspondence shared internally between employees of a bank were defamatory, but other jurisdictions welcome too.

  • 6
    "the overwhelming majority of defamation cases involve public statements accessible to large if not unlimited audiences." Are you sure of that? Single person publication or small number of persons publication defamation lawsuits are disproportionately represented in suits filed because suits are usually filed when the damages flow from a particular person (like an employer or lender or prospective contract counterparty) making a particular economic decision based upon a defamatory statement.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 1:08
  • 4
    @ohwilleke it did feel a tad presumptuous when writing this; I suppose what I really meant [now edited] is the ones you hear about tend not to be private communications. If it is actually not unusual at all for a one-to-one communication to give rise to a defamation claim this is itself somewhat answers the question.
    – Will
    Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 8:20
  • 4
    It is not unusual at all for a one-to-one communication to give rise to a defamation suit. I don't have exact statistics (this isn't a subject upon which formal records are maintained) but I'd estimate that maybe 25%-40% of defamation lawsuits are one-to-one communication cases.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 8:55

3 Answers 3


Damages for libel have been awarded based on publication to a single individual.

The elements of defamation are (Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, para. 28):

(1) that the impugned words were defamatory, in the sense that they would tend to lower the plaintiff’s reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person; (2) that the words in fact referred to the plaintiff; and (3) that the words were published, meaning that they were communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff.

For an example, see Faryna v. Chorny, [1952] 2 D.L.R. 354 (B.C.C.A). A letter "imputing unchastity" of a housekeeper was sent to a single individual.

  • 2
    I find this such an interesting definition, because it doesn't seem to include the truth or untruth of the statement. So is it libellous to report someone's ill-deeds even if it definitely happened? (Or perhaps this isn't the complete definition ;))
    – AJFaraday
    Commented Jul 25, 2023 at 9:15
  • 1
    The law at least in England and Wales sets out truth as a defense for libel or defamation actions, rather than excluding true things from the definition of defamation: something that's true can be defamatory, but you'll still lose in court. See Wikipedia
    – Stuart F
    Commented Jul 25, 2023 at 14:59
  • The point of "truth as a defense" is that the plaintiff doesn't have to prove that the statement is false. If the defendant wants to claim that it's true the defendant has to prove it.
    – PJB
    Commented Jul 25, 2023 at 19:14
  • @AJFaraday: Coming at this from a semantical perspective, "defamation" does not inherently define factuality of the claims, in the same sense that "defenestration" does not inherently define whether it was a murder, an accident, or a well-intentioned act.
    – Flater
    Commented Jul 26, 2023 at 4:44


To be defamatory, the material has to be published (communicated by any means, including written, orally, pictorially) to at least one person other than the person making the claim.

Arts Law Information Sheet

Whether disclosure to one person can cause real harm depends on what is told and to whom. A lie to a (prospective) employer, University admissions officer, or security service vetting agent could be very damaging.

  • 2
    This is also the rule of U.S. law.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 1:06
  • 9
    Question asks for actual cases, not what could happen. Commented Jul 24, 2023 at 10:32

Consider the case of Oscar Wilde v the Marquess of Queensbury, which has become a text-book example.

Queensbury handed to a porter at Wilde's club a calling card on which he'd written something like 'To Oscar Wilde posing as a somdomite [sic].(accounts vary, but not relevantly.)

The people actually seeing the comment on the card might have included only the porter but a potentially much larger audience was undoubted.

The law being more stringent back in 1895, Queensbury was apparently arrested and criminally charged with libel.

As it happens, Wilde lost his case on the grounds that Queensbury's remark was not defamatory but rather, true but even that is not relevant.

What matters is that the card was left lying around the club and might have been seen by anyone picking it up and turning it over - or simply by the porter to whom it was actually given.

That is to say, the audience need be no larger than 'perhaps one or more'.

Of course if it was established that the audience was in fact no more than one, damages would be correspondingly small and but the degree of defamation is not the point: libel did or dit not occur.

  • 1
    Another point to consider is that the act of making a defamatory statement to one person who would be expected to believe it and pass it on as true, could be construed as making the statement to all of the people who might end up hearing it.
    – supercat
    Commented Jul 28, 2023 at 16:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .