My colleagues and I created a document together. I want to use the document in a book and plan to make a profit. What rights do the co-authors have to my profit and is there a way to protect my profit?

2 Answers 2


Under US copyright law (17 USC 201, "The authors of a joint work are coowners of copyright in the work". Barring an explicit agreement to the contrary, each author of a joint work shares an undivided interest in the entire joint work.

Rights to profit derive from a contractual agreement with a publisher. Therefore, you have to look into the specifics of the agreement with the publisher – such agreements can be quite variable. The question that you would have to ask is whether the particular agreement that you sign is actually "true", for example, do you represent that you are the sole owner of copyright (you are not)? You can negotiate away your property rights, but you cannot negotiate away your co-authors' rights. There will almost certainly be an indemnification clause in the agreement saying that if your actions lead to the publisher getting sued then you will legally defend them (pay for their lawyer, pay whatever judgment is rendered against them...). You can negotiate a license with a publisher that send all the royalties to you as long as you are up-front about the fact that you are a co-author and therefore they do not have an exclusive license (often a deal-breaker with publishers).


In short: if you created your document together, all of you are authors and publishing the document needs permission from all authors. Therefore, unless you have a previous agreement, your colleagues can ask you whatever they want for their permission, and it's up to you to decide if giving them what they ask for is better than writing a completely different document yourself alone.

Details may vary according to jurisdiction and specifics of your situation, but the general idea is going to be the same everywhere.

Just a caveat since you mentioned your colleagues: If you created that document as a part of your work, please beware that its copyright may belong to your employer and you will need your employer's permission to publish it (possibly in addition to the permission from your colleagues).

And just a likely out-of-scope cautionary note: There are posts in https://academia.stackexchange.com/ explaining that publishing a book is unlikely to yield substantial profits for the author. Hopefully, YMMV.

  • Whether all autors need to give permission for use varies by jurisdiction: in some they do, in others they don't.
    – Dale M
    Commented Aug 30, 2023 at 0:18
  • 1
    @DaleM do you have an example of such a jurisdiction / fact pattern? (genuine question.) I know the barrier to be considered an "author" with respect to copyright law varies, but I thought that "you need consent from all authors for anything not covered by copyright exceptions" is standard across at least all Berne countries.
    – KFK
    Commented Sep 5, 2023 at 14:41
  • @KFK If you have a question, ask a question. Don’t hide it in a comment on an answer.
    – Dale M
    Commented Sep 6, 2023 at 12:15
  • 1
    @DaleM My comment refers to your comment, not to Pere’s answer. Your comment made a claim that is surprising (to me at least) and cites no reference. Yes, I could turn it into a question in its own right, and if an answer comes back that contradicts your comment, leave another comment saying "DaleM is wrong, here’s a link"; but that seems less efficient and less polite than asking you directly.
    – KFK
    Commented Sep 6, 2023 at 14:25
  • @KFK the site is not about efficiency, it’s a Q&A site for questions about the law. Do you have a question about the law?
    – Dale M
    Commented Sep 6, 2023 at 22:19

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .