According to Wikipedia which in turn cites p 63, “Schoenfield, Mark (1997), "Waging battle: Ashford v Thornton, Ivanhoe and legal violence", in Simmons, Clare (ed.), Medievalism and the Quest for the "Real" Middle Ages, Routledge, pp. 61–86, ISBN 978-0-7146-5145-3”,
Because of the nature of the evidence women were not permitted to witness the trial, [22]
I am wondering what specifically about the evidence was considered so unsuitable as to prompted exclude women from observing. For example, was it the fact that it involved exhibiting the male defendant’s blood-stained undergarments? Or simply because the charges included the sexual assault of a woman which would naturally then be discussed at length in the witnesses’ evidence?
Regardless, what was the judicial rationale, or the rationale behind the pre standing mechanisms in the first place that were used to so exclude them, of preventing women from being exposed to such evidence? Are there any relevant provisions or remarks that make reference to the logic of relevant cultural considerations?