2

I recently bought a second hand car from a fairly small dealership. Within 60 miles of driving the engine management light came on. I took it back and they diagnosed the problem as being the catalytic converter and said this wasn't covered by the warranty as it is classified as "wear and tear".

They cleared the fault code and gave the car back to me, and said to bring it back again if the warning light comes back on. Again, after about 60 miles driving the light has come back on, so I need to take it back again.

I'm certain that they knew about this fault before I bought the car - it's too much of a coincidence that it happened just after I bought the car. I think it should be covered by the 1979 Sale of Goods Act because any reasonable person would come to the conclusion that the fault was there before I bought the vehicle, but the dealer obviously disagrees.

Am I covered by the Sale of Goods Act? Or should I just give in and get it repaired myself? I don't want to start mentioning legal stuff like this to them if I don't have a leg to stand on.

2

I am not a lawyer; I am not your lawyer.

From the Sale of Goods Act 1979:

(2)Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.
(2A)For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.
(2B)For the purposes of this Act, the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods—
(a)fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied,
(b)appearance and finish,
(c)freedom from minor defects,
(d)safety, and
(e)durability.
(2C)The term implied by subsection (2) above does not extend to any matter making the quality of goods unsatisfactory—
(a)which is specifically drawn to the buyer’s attention before the contract is made,
(b)where the buyer examines the goods before the contract is made, which that examination ought to reveal, or
(c)in the case of a contract for sale by sample, which would have been apparent on a reasonable examination of the sample.

Based on my interpretation of this, it would depend on the information about the car you were provided at the time you bought it.

  • If the information you were given was such that a reasonable person would expect the catalytic converter to be faulty, then the Sale of Goods Act is unlikely to serve your interests, in this case.
  • If the representations were that the car was fit for purpose, however, and a reasonable person would have expected it to run without fault for some reasonable amount of time, then you may be able to bring an action against the dealership.

Note: The fact that a reasonable person would come to the conclusion that the fault was pre-existing is irrelevant if it was disclosed ahead of time. Additionally, the fact that it was a used car may change what would be considered reasonable in this case.

In either case, I suggest you seek legal advice and/or a second opinion from another mechanic on your car. You may be able to find out more about whether this is, in fact, something that would be expected.

Also, keep all documentation you have, including any advertisements for the sale of the car.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.