Questions tagged [precedent]

Also known as "stare decisis:" the legal principle that any cases with the same facts should have the same judicial outcome.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
3 answers
131 views

What is the justification for supreme courts being able to overrule/overturn their own past decisions?

It can’t overturn the constitution in most countries for example which gives the past apparent supremacy over the present. But between different eras of Supreme courts I guess the present takes ...
user avatar
  • 1,845
1 vote
2 answers
131 views

Are US appeals court decisions binding on nonparties to a case?

To what extent do the decisions of appellate courts in the US (both Federal and State), and particularly decisions of the US Supreme Court, bind those who were not parties to the case? And to what ...
user avatar
  • 89.2k
0 votes
2 answers
84 views

How does Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health compare to previous decisions which reaffirmed Roe v. Wade? [closed]

How does Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health compare to previous cases which reaffirmed Roe v. Wade—e.g., Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989), Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)?
user avatar
  • 678
1 vote
3 answers
144 views

How much does civilian-jury cases impact legal precedent?

Apropos of the Kyle Rittenhouse case: In the Rittenhouse case, one of the arguments made by the prosecution (I don't know if it was a "main" argument as I only watched snippets of the ...
user avatar
  • 171
17 votes
2 answers
4k views

When an old Supreme Court ruling is overturned by a new one, how is this explained philosophically?

When a new SCOTUS ruling overturns an old one, what is the philosophical difference between the two rulings? It seems to me that there are two possible explanations; either the old ruling was a ...
user avatar
  • 3,211
0 votes
2 answers
58 views

Are there federal or international law equivalents of the Maxims of Jurisprudence of the California Civil Code?

Specifically, does Civ. Code § 3517 "No one can take advantage of his own wrong" have such an equivalent? Any others are welcome or anything similar.
user avatar
  • 2,601
4 votes
3 answers
188 views

Isn't the rule of precedent inherently flawed in the adversarial system?

In the adversarial system, who wins in a court proceeding basically depends on how the parties present and argue their cases. That is, the same facts and evidence could yield diametrically opposite ...
user avatar
  • 19.8k
1 vote
1 answer
73 views

When courts set a new precedent, are the negatively impacted parties given any leniency?

Suppose the courts set a precedent by interpreting ambiguous law in a way that negatively affects one of the parties of a case. When deciding on remedies, damages, or a criminal sentence, will courts ...
user avatar
  • 113
4 votes
1 answer
219 views

During your trial, the Supreme Court of the US agrees to hear an appeal of a relevant precedent case. What is the law that you are presumed to know?

Imagine a court case in progress in the USA, specifically a case at the first level of the courts (i.e. it is a district court case and the court is a trial court, not any kind of appeal court). ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
213 views

Does the XR vs. Shell case create precedent for environmental activism being necessary?

Six Extinction Rebellion activists were charged with criminal damage to the Shell HQ building in London’s Waterloo in April 2019. All admitted the actions, and five of the six relied on the defense ...
user avatar
  • 179
8 votes
2 answers
932 views

Do the observations of constitutional courts that are not necessary for deciding the case form binding precedents for lower courts?

My question concerns the principle that constitutional courts should not decide what is not strictly necessary for deciding the case at hand. What happens if, say the Supreme Court, made well reasoned ...
user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
134 views

Technical basis for the binding nature of precedent or stare decisis

I understand that US district courts are generally required to follow precedent set by the appeals court directly superior to the district court, while opinions of other appeals courts may be ...
user avatar
  • 24.6k
0 votes
1 answer
53 views

Circuit court misquotes supreme court: what precedent does district court follow?

In United States v. Bowman (1922), the Supreme Court ruled that the presumption against the extraterritorial application of a statute does not apply to statutes that are "not logically dependent ...
user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
65 views

How/where to find precedent civil cases (Canada)?

I am interested in learning about some civil cases that happened in the past. What are the resources that one could use to find thematic breakdown of such cases? For example, where would I be able to ...
user avatar
  • 153
0 votes
1 answer
63 views

Has punishment for precedent-setting decisions ever been recognized as retroactive enforcement of a new law?

When a court sets a precedent, it is effectively creating a law (case law). This means that the law (or a newly clear interpretation that can only now be relied on) did not exist prior to the courts ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
74 views

How are affirmative defenses of duress and necessity treated in U.S. law?

Duress and Necessity are two common law "affirmative defenses" that can be argued for acquittal of a criminal charge. However I can't find clear law or precedent for either in the United ...
user avatar
  • 19.8k
1 vote
3 answers
159 views

How is it that Law may work by "legal precedent" but then it also "goes with the current culture and ethics"?

Since Legal Precedent is important or crucial, but at the same time the current culture or ethics also can play an important role, then how do they work together -- won't they conflict with each other?...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
291 views

Has anybody else taken legal action against California's "only 26 letters in names" rule?

This is inspired by another question: Is Elon Musk's child name valid in California? The accepted answer quotes the a handbook from California Department of Public Health, Vital Records, p. 112: ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
22 views

Binding precedent based on reasoning or conclusion

Suppose a circuit panel publishes the following decision: Statute A applies to individuals in situation B, because X implies Y. Are the trial judges within this circuit bound to the statement that ...
user avatar
4 votes
5 answers
198 views

Trying to get sued?

Are there any situations in which some party would seek to be sued? The thought came up while I was looking at some law related to copyright and public domain where it was noted that some parts were ...
user avatar
  • 263
1 vote
1 answer
65 views

Does a U.S. District judge's decision set binding horizontal precedent in the same district?

Suppose a U.S. district judge in, say, the Southern district of New York writes a decision regarding some legal procedure. Can a different U.S. district judge in the same district write a ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
180 views

Can "positive news coverage" be considered a "thing of value" in a bribery case? Has it ever been prosecuted in the US before?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing several corruption charges. It's a complex, multi-faceted case, but at the heart of the indictment, is a bribery charge involving "positive news ...
user avatar
  • 528
2 votes
2 answers
105 views

Is there a precedent for a lawsuit against someone for making a decision that goes against public health?

So I live in a city that has these organizers who are newspaper owners that are about to go forward with a huge event that brings people from all over despite the fact that I just saw the coronavirus ...
user avatar
  • 309
2 votes
2 answers
191 views

Is there any legal recourse for a resident who believes their city is committing financial nonfeasance?

My city has entered into an agreement to provide fire service to a neighboring city of 1000 people for $10,000 yearly. This rate is less than 1/20th what my city pays. I've made efforts to convince ...
user avatar
  • 165
1 vote
2 answers
141 views

Are open letters protected by freedom of speech? Any court precedents?

I would like to know if there is legal precedent protecting the freedom of speech in distributing an open letter or something similar. A friend owns a unit in a condominium, and since day one she has ...
user avatar
  • 381
1 vote
4 answers
247 views

Doesn't the use of precedent constitute a bandwagon fallacy?

I see widespread use of precedent in courts across the world. In essence, to me this appears as follows: "Just because some other people responded to x with y, then any time we see something ...
user avatar
  • 277
4 votes
4 answers
139 views

Are legal precedents or tests ever created outside of a traditional trial?

Layperson question ahead. My understanding is that laws as passed by federal, state, and local bodies are often open to interpretation. When a question arises during a trial, a judge's logic and ...
user avatar
  • 448
2 votes
1 answer
70 views

What is the functional effect of overturning precedent?

Background On occasion, the Supreme Court overturns precedents in part or in whole. This means that a previous ruling (or part of a ruling) from the supreme court that once had stare decesis no ...
user avatar
  • 1,529
2 votes
1 answer
110 views

Given Shapiro v. Thompson, why are US states allowed to charge higher tuition fees to new residents?

If I'm reading Shapiro v. Thompson correctly, US states are not allowed to require a period of residence before providing welfare benefits to US citizens. But doesn't this mean that charging different ...
user avatar
  • 2,578
2 votes
2 answers
134 views

Legal precedent/history for the supposed charges against Julian Assange

It has been reported in the media (e.g. RT, BBC) that the US has requested the extradition of Julian Assange from the UK to stand trial for the charge of conspiracy to intrude into a computer system (...
user avatar
  • 569
1 vote
1 answer
63 views

Was anyone held liable/accountable in the 2018 Hawaii False Missile Alert?

On January 13, 2018, with belligerent threats and nuclear tensions between the US and North Korea on a knife edge, civil authorities in the US state of Hawaii sent out an alert to all cell phones, ...
user avatar
  • 4,509
1 vote
1 answer
129 views

Legal precedent vs. statutory law

Following the Roe v. Wade decision, abortion became legal in all fifty states. However, Congress never had to pass a law or constitutional amendment defending abortion rights. In what types of cases ...
user avatar
  • 528
1 vote
1 answer
289 views

Does statute take precedence over case law (in the US)?

Hypothetical situation: An US court decides a case for which there is no statute nor previous court decision (precedent) which would provide how the case should be decided (resolved). So the court (...
user avatar
  • 145
1 vote
1 answer
85 views

Ruling striking down the Affordable Care Act

What does Friday's ruling mean? I thought the Supreme Court already upheld the individual mandate and most aspects of the law.
user avatar
  • 528
0 votes
3 answers
215 views

Legal precedent paradox

Suppose that five people (A, B, C, D, and E) are being tried for breaking some law. What B did is slightly worse than what A did, what C did is slightly worse than what B did, and so on... Suppose ...
user avatar
  • 11
4 votes
3 answers
462 views

Is citing precedent official in the US court system?

Precedent from other similar cases is often cited in US court cases because the US follows stare decisis in keeping rulings consistent. However, is this based on how the courts tend to run ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
622 views

Employee Handbook conflicts with State Law, Which Supersedes Which?

Under my State's (Colorado) law, C.R.S. § 8-4-101(14)(a)(III) states, Vacation pay earned in accordance with the terms of any agreement. If an employer provides paid vacation for an employee, the ...
user avatar
  • 133
3 votes
2 answers
590 views

Have Supreme Court cases with multiple subsequent reaffirming decisions been overturned?

Suppose Supreme Court decision A is subsequently reaffirmed in decisions B and C. Have there ever been situations where the court later overturns A, despite B and C?
user avatar
  • 678
5 votes
1 answer
204 views

Can a sitting president of the United States be indicted by one of the states?

Some lawyers say a sitting president cannot be indicted, other lawyers disagree. Apart from that, does what they are saying apply to both federal and state indictments? I mean could the president be ...
user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
139 views

Is there any constitutional precedent or laws against bills of “anti"-attainder?

In South Dakota an attorney for adults sexually abused as children by priests and nuns contended that the state legislature passed a statute of limitations (in approximately 2010) preventing lawsuits ...
user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
375 views

How do concepts like intent, discrimination, and bias apply to an Artificial Intelligence agent?

Background I work at a financial institution in the United States and have been researching the regulatory impacts of Artificial Intelligence recently - specifically the simple purpose-specific ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
254 views

After US Supreme Court overturns precedent, are old cases revisited?

Hypothetical scenario: 1950: government uses method A to convict John Doe of crime B, SCOTUS upholds conviction 1990: government uses method A to convict Jake Smith of crime B 2000: government ...
user avatar
  • 143
2 votes
2 answers
2k views

What is the significance of dissenting opinions in appellate court decisions?

Appellate courts often hear cases en banc and decide them by simple majority of the judges on the bench. The majority will typically sign a single "per curiam" decision, which constitutes the ...
user avatar
  • 19.8k
2 votes
2 answers
159 views

How could Korematsu be overturned?

The US Supreme Court Case Korematsu (1944) ruled that the internment of American citizens of Japanese ancestry was legal out of concern for national security. This case is now generally regarded as a ...
user avatar
  • 1,148
3 votes
2 answers
2k views

Legal remedies if a lower court ignores stare decisis?

Let's say hypothetically that lower courts en masse decide to ignore Supreme Court decisions. What legal alternatives are available to citizens if lower courts "Go rogue" and decides to ignore a ...
user avatar
  • 3,425
1 vote
3 answers
284 views

What happens to struck-down laws when the decision(s) that killed them are reversed?

If a law is struck-down as unconstitutional, but all the precedent used to find it unconstitutional gets reversed; what becomes of the law? Is it totally dead, needing be passed anew? Can the ...
user avatar
  • 499
0 votes
1 answer
37 views

I can't read this cover of a precedent case

Embarrassing, I have a very simple question. I can't interprete this cover of a precedent case because I am an English learner. Please give me your help. In the middle of the image I attached below, ...
user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
697 views

Persuasive authority using other jurisdiction's opinions

I'm an English teacher who teaches legal English to foreign students using the UK legal system for context. I was checking the definition of 'Persuasive authority' using TransLegals' dictionary and ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
1k views

In UK law how binding is judge precedent, and when can it be ignored?

Once a court has set precedent, can it ever be ignored? Is it legally binding, or just very persuasive advice? Are there any examples of a judge ignoring precedent without setting new precedent, or is ...
user avatar
  • 123
2 votes
1 answer
105 views

Are decided legal cases reviewed when precedent cases are overturned?

When the outcome of a case is largely decided by a precedent case, what happens to the cases citing it?
user avatar