Bob is accused of a crime. He believes the accusation was malicious and abetted by the police and that video recodings _may_ have corroborating or direct evidence of this. The video evidence is reported to have been created by the police and in the possession of the DA.

The DA provided all evidence to the defense except the video recordings. Bob's lawyer does not appear to be co-operating with Bob's wish to request the video.

Does Bob have a right to be presented such evidence or obtain a copy before a pre-trial conference, without his lawyer's co-operation?

For example due to a fair trial, to a just outcome, to effective assistance of counsel, to the right to raise concerns about the effective assistance of counsel under a Marsden motion or based on any other well-established case law or legal theory on statute, the constitution, or any treaty.