New answers tagged

0 is the best tool I've found so far for looking up citations. Cornell's legal site @Jack Fleeting linked is the best site I've found so far. It has some references to other documents linked and tries to give definitions to some terms used in the text.


18 U.S. Code § 2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court ...


There a few places; this particular statute, for example, can be found on Cornell's legal site or on that of the House.


44 U.S.C. 22 That copy was probably not a record (B) does not include any documentary materials that are ...(iv) extra copies of documents produced only for convenience of reference, when such copies are clearly so identified. I said probably because someone will say “it was not clearly identified as a copy.” I don’t think that is relevant. It was ...


While there is an act that President Trump and his supporters are citing, titled the Presidential Records Act (PRA), to accuse House Speaker Pelosi of breaking federal law, it is important to understand what actions the law accounts for. The act mandates that the President of the United States preserve records and other laws governing the federal ...

Top 50 recent answers are included