Timeline for What is the legal grounds for the MA approved gun roster?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2016 at 23:20 | history | edited | atk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Jul 23, 2016 at 14:40 | comment | added | feetwet♦ | You might clarify the original question to note that it's not that the gun is "illegal," but rather that it can't be sold in the state (unless "grandfathered"). | |
| Jul 23, 2016 at 11:27 | comment | added | atk | It's not a law but a regulation. Yes, I don't have the direct reference handy, but the reg requires specific features, including a loaded chamber indicator. If the firearm doesn't have one, the AG has deemed it unfit for sale in MA. | |
| Jul 23, 2016 at 2:34 | answer | added | feetwet♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 23, 2016 at 2:06 | history | edited | feetwet♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tags and typo
|
| Jul 23, 2016 at 1:26 | comment | added | user4657 | Are you sure this law has roots in required presences, and not required absences? That is - it's not a list of things approved because they all have certain features, it's a list of things approved because they lack certain features (and then still, it may be certain combinations or numbers of restricted feature are okay). | |
| Jul 23, 2016 at 1:05 | history | asked | atk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |