Your scenario is skirting fraud, which is a criminal issue; I'm assuming that was unintentional and that criminal questions were beyond the scope of what you intended.

A person could claim standing by demonstrating:

• They voted successfully, but at a precinct effected where their vote may have been discarded based on the policy in question.
• They voted successfully, but they were disproportionally or unreasonably burdened by the policy during the registration and/or voting process.
• They were unable to register and/or vote because of the policy.
• They were a candidate for election and were on the ballot in a precinct effected by the policy.

Your scenario is skirting fraud, which is a criminal issue; I'm assuming that was unintentional and that criminal questions were beyond the scope of what you intended.

A person could claim standing by demonstrating:

• They voted successfully, but at a precinct affected where their vote may have been discarded based on the policy in question.
• They voted successfully, but they were disproportionately or unreasonably burdened by the policy during the registration and/or voting process.
• They were unable to register and/or vote because of the policy.
• They were a candidate for election and were on the ballot in a precinct affected by the policy.