Timeline for Does this image with a subject containing graffiti in the background infringe on the graffiti artist's copyright?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2019 at 8:29 | comment | added | nikk wong | I understand your perspective that the photo is about the graffiti. However, in my perspective, the photo is about my product and the model holding it, and the graffiti complements it. I think an argument could be made for both sides. | |
| Feb 16, 2019 at 4:11 | history | edited | nikk wong | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 22 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2019 at 4:01 | history | edited | nikk wong | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 454 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2019 at 3:21 | comment | added | R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE | Even just casually from a non-lawyer perspective, this does not seem like fair use. If it were a photograph of a larger scene where the graffiti just happened to be visible in part of it, there would be a good question, but here the entire composition is based on the graffiti. If you didn't care about having it there to make the photo stand out, the same subject could have been photographed in a studio or anywhere else with nothing specific to the location lost. | |
| Feb 16, 2019 at 0:34 | history | protected | BlueDogRanch | ||
| Feb 16, 2019 at 0:14 | answer | added | Russell McMahon | timeline score: -2 | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 19:25 | comment | added | Andrew T. | Since this is apparently related to Instagram, you might be interested in reading Instagram's help center for "Copyright" | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 17:32 | comment | added | David Siegel | @Acccumulation, I don't think it matters to the copyright issue. In any case "graffiti" is also used for informal but legal mural street art. | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 17:30 | comment | added | Acccumulation | The term "graffiti" generally refers to vandalism. Was this a legal work of art? | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 6:16 | answer | added | A876 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 23:47 | vote | accept | nikk wong | ||
| Feb 14, 2019 at 23:13 | answer | added | David Siegel | timeline score: 30 | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 22:22 | comment | added | David Siegel | In the US, copyright is entirely a matter of federal law, so the jurisdiction here is United States. I have so tagged it. | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 22:21 | history | edited | David Siegel |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 14, 2019 at 22:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 28, 2019 at 22:10 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2019 at 22:07 | history | asked | nikk wong | CC BY-SA 4.0 |