Timeline for Are there circumstances in which the source of drugs used by police provides a defense to those accused of crimes involving the drugs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2020 at 20:41 | history | edited | feetwet♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 4:26 | comment | added | Breakskater | @Viktor no, the police made the pharmacy's drugs available to buy but did not ask the person to buy them. The officer however did order the pharmacist to sell drugs out of the pharmacy's stock to someone | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 4:17 | comment | added | Viktor | Did the police ask the someone to buy the drugs? | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 21:01 | history | edited | jqning | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
tried to make question more comprehensible, it's hard when we only get 150 characters
|
| Nov 19, 2015 at 6:23 | answer | added | jimsug | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 3:35 | comment | added | Breakskater | @DaleM, Is the buyer shielded? Such as in State v. Williams, 623 So. 2d 462 Fla. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 3:34 | comment | added | Breakskater | Downvoter, please explain the reason. | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 3:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 5, 2015 at 3:04 | |||||
| Nov 19, 2015 at 2:57 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | Sorry, who is shielded: the pharmacy, the law enforcement officer or the buyer? | |
| Nov 19, 2015 at 2:08 | history | asked | Breakskater | CC BY-SA 3.0 |