Skip to main content
deleted 152 characters in body
Source Link

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]. We also have a conservative judge, Matthew Brann, in the state of Pennsylvannia, 'accusing' Trumps legal team of trying to:

disenfranchise almost seven million voters ... [by using] strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.

This sounds like Brann is accusing Trumps team not only of 'frivolity', but something much worse.

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican, the ex-Governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]. We also have a conservative judge, Matthew Brann, in the state of Pennsylvannia, 'accusing' Trumps legal team of trying to:

disenfranchise almost seven million voters ... [by using] strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.

This sounds like Brann is accusing Trumps team not only of 'frivolity', but something much worse.

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. We also have a conservative judge, Matthew Brann, in the state of Pennsylvannia, 'accusing' Trumps legal team of trying to:

disenfranchise almost seven million voters ... [by using] strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.

This sounds like Brann is accusing Trumps team not only of 'frivolity', but something much worse.

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican, the ex-Governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.'

added 297 characters in body
Source Link

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]. We also have a conservative judge, Matthew Brann, in the state of Pennsylvannia, 'accusing' Trumps legal team of trying to:

disenfranchise almost seven million voters ... [by using] strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.

This sounds like Brann is accusing Trumps team not only of 'frivolity', but something much worse.

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

edit

@Peter: it's not just someone who called the Trumps legal team an embarrassment but s prominent Republican senator. And if that is what he thinks, I'm sure you can imagine what the courts think.

@Ryan M: Ditto. See above.

BTW, would you both consider your comments here frivolous and not really to the point?

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

edit

@Peter: it's not just someone who called the Trumps legal team an embarrassment but s prominent Republican senator. And if that is what he thinks, I'm sure you can imagine what the courts think.

@Ryan M: Ditto. See above.

BTW, would you both consider your comments here frivolous and not really to the point?

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]. We also have a conservative judge, Matthew Brann, in the state of Pennsylvannia, 'accusing' Trumps legal team of trying to:

disenfranchise almost seven million voters ... [by using] strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations ... unsupported by evidence.

This sounds like Brann is accusing Trumps team not only of 'frivolity', but something much worse.

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

added 91 characters in body
Source Link

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

edit

@Peter: it's not just someone who called the Trumps legal team an embarrassment but s prominent Republican senator. And if that is what he thinks, I'm sure you can imagine what the courts think.

@Ryan M: Ditto. See above.

BTW, would you both consider your comments here frivolous and not really to the point?

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

edit

@Peter: it's not just someone who called the Trumps legal team an embarrassment but s prominent Republican senator. And if that is what he thinks, I'm sure you can imagine what the courts think.

@Ryan M: Ditto. See above.

Taken at face value this would imply that the legal cases are really bad, effectively wasting court time. This in turn implies that the judges would have handed down a frivolous litigation judgement with associated penalties for the plaintiffs. But if this has happened, I'vd not seen it reported in the news. Why?

Perhaps it depends where in the media you go looking for news on this:

I've read that more than two dozen lawsuits have been thrown out by the courts. [Here, I'm confirming that they are 'wasting courts' time]

And I have also heard on the BBC, that one prominent republican has called Trumps law team, 'a national embarrassment.' [That even if the courts aren't calling this an embarrassment, other people are prepared to do so. And this confirms the OP's assessment].

edit

@Peter: it's not just someone who called the Trumps legal team an embarrassment but s prominent Republican senator. And if that is what he thinks, I'm sure you can imagine what the courts think.

@Ryan M: Ditto. See above.

BTW, would you both consider your comments here frivolous and not really to the point?

added 240 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 517 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 40 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading